MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Mechanized formal methods: progress and prospects (1996) [2 citations — 0 self]

Download:
pdf | ps
by John Rushby
In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on the Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science #1180
http://www.csl.sri.com/reports/postscript/fsttcs96.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

Abstract. In the decade of the 1990s, formal methods have progressed from an academic curiosity at best, and a target of ridicule at worst, to a point where the leading manufacturer of microprocessors has indicated that its next design will be formally verified. In this short paper, I sketch a plausible history of the developments that led to this transformation, present a snapshot of the current state of the practice, and indicate some promising directions for the future. Mindful of the title of this conference, I suggest how formal methods might have an impact on software similar to that which they have had on hardware. 1 The Past In their early days (the 1970s---though continuing to the present in some places), formal methods were associated with proofs of program correctness. This is not only a very costly and difficult exercise---it requires formalizing the semantics of real programming languages, and dealing with the scale and characteristics of real imperative programs---but it also adds very little value: traditional methods

Citations

1128 Symbolic Model Checking – McMillan - 1993
993 The Z notation: a reference manual – Spivey - 1992
724 Symbolic boolean manipulation with Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams – Bryant - 1992
592 Systematic Software Development Using VDM – Jones - 1986
295 Formal verification for fault-tolerant architectures: Prolegomena to the design of PVS – Owre, Rushby, et al. - 1995
205 Protocol verification as a hardware design aid – Dill, Drexler, et al. - 1992
172 PVS: Combining specification, proof checking, and model checking – Owre, Rajan, et al. - 1996
88 Completeness and consistency in hierarchical state-base requirements – Heimdahl, Leveson - 1996
86 An Integration of Model-checking with Automated Proof Checking – Rajan, Shankar, et al. - 1995
83 Verification of the futurebus+ cache coherence protocol – Clarke, Grumberg, et al. - 1995
78 Analyzing Software Requirements Errors in Safety-Critical, Embedded Systems – Lutz - 1993
77 Experiments in theorem proving and model checking for protocol verification – Havelund, Shankar - 1996
65 Elements of style: Analyzing a software design feature with a counterexample detector – Jackson, Damon - 1996
62 Applying formal verification to the AAMP5 microprocessor: A case study in the industrial use of formal methods – Miller, Srivas - 1996
55 Formal Methods Reality Check: Industrial Usage – Craigen, Gerhart, et al. - 1995
54 ACL2 Theorems about Commercial Microprocessors – Brock, Kaufmann, et al. - 1996
32 Verification of FLASH cache coherence protocol by aggregation of distributed transactions – Park, Dill - 1996
27 Feasibility of model checking software requirements: A case study – Sreemani, Atlee - 1996
25 Verifying the srt division algorithm using theorem proving techniques – Clarke, German, et al. - 1996
22 Bit-level analysis of an srt divider circuit – Bryant - 1996
16 Using formal verification/analysis methods on the critical path in system design: A case study – Eiriksson, McMillan - 1995
16 Anatomy of the Pentium bug – PRATT - 1995
15 An Executable Specification, Analyzer and Verifier for RMO (Relaxed Memory Order – Park, Dill - 1995
12 Srivas. Modular verification of SRT division – Rue, Shankar, et al. - 1996
12 Automated deduction and formal methods – Rushby - 1996
11 Verification of IEEE compliant subtractive division algorithms – Miner, Leathrum - 1996
5 Experiences and lessons from the analysis of TCAS II – Heimdahl - 1996
5 Using PVS to analyze hierarchical state-based requirements for completeness and consistency – Heimdahl, Czerny - 1996
4 Theorem proving: Not an esoteric diversion, but the unifying framework for industrial verification – Cyrluk, Srivas - 1995
4 Computer-aided computing – Shankar - 1995
4 Unifying verification paradigms – Shankar - 1996
3 Calculating with Requirements – Rushby - 1997
2 Manpreet Khaira, and Xudong Zhao. Word level symbolic model checking---avoiding the Pentium FDIV error – Clarke - 1996