MetaCartSign in to MyCiteSeer

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

Include Citations | Advanced Search | Help

  Worm detection using local networks (2004) [2 citations — 1 self]

Download:
pdf
by Xinzhou Qin, David Dagon, Guofei Gu, Wenke Lee
ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu/pub/coc/tech_reports/2004/GIT-CC-04-04.pdf
Add To MetaCart

Abstract:

The need for a global monitoring system for Internet worm detection is clear. Likewise, the need for local detection and response is also obvious. In this study, we used a large data set to review some of the worm monitoring and detection strategies proposed for large networks, and found them difficult to apply to local networks. In particular, the Kalman filter and victim number-based approaches proved unsuitable for smaller networks. They are of course appropriate for large systems, but what work well for local networks? We propose two algorithms tailored for local network monitoring needs. First, the Destination Source Correlation (DSC) algorithm focuses on the infection relation, and tracks real infected hosts (and not merely scans) to provide an accurate response. Second, the HoneyStat system provides a way to track the short-term infection behavior used by worms. Potentially, this provides a basis for statistical inference about a worm’s behavior on a network. 1

Citations

797 A new approach to linear filtering and predictionn problems – Kalman - 1960
144 Code-Red: a case study on the spread and victims of an Internet worm – Moore, Shannon, et al. - 2002
121 Code red worm propagation modeling and analysis – Zou, Gong, et al. - 2002
94 Monitoring and early warning for internet worms – Zou, Gao, et al. - 2003
93 Modeling the spread of active worms – Chen, Gao, et al. - 2003
93 A virtual honeypot framework – Provos - 2004
78 Directed-graph Epidemiological Models of Computer Viruses – Kephart, White - 1991
72 Honeypots: Tracking Hackers – Spitzner - 2002
51 Anomaly Detection of Webbased Attacks – Kruegel, Vigna - 2003
44 Measuring and modeling computer virus prevalence – KEPHART, R - 1993
41 An Effective Architecture and Algorithm for Detecting Worms with Various Scan Techniques – Wu, Vanagala, et al. - 2004
37 Network telescopes: Observing small or distant security events – Moore - 2002
29 Computers and epidemiology – Kephart, Chess, et al. - 1993
25 Routing worm: A fast, selective attack worm based on IP address information – Zou, Towsley, et al. - 2005
24 Warhol Worm: The Potential for Very Fast Internet Plagues – Weaver
23 The use of honeynets to detect exploited systems across large enterprise networks – Levine, LaBella, et al. - 2002
18 Using sensor networks and data fusion for early detection of active worms – Berk, Gray, et al. - 2000
15 to 0wn the Internet in Your Spare Time – How
9 Applied Logistic Regression. WileyInterscience – Hosmer, Lemeshow - 1989
5 Know Your Enemy: Honeynets. http://project.honeynet.org/papers/honeynet – Project - 2001
5 Upper Saddle River – Skoudis, Hack - 2002
4 Code red analysis pages: July infestation analysis. http://www.silicondefense.com/cr/july.html – Staniford - 2001
2 internet traffic storage. http://wad.cs.waikato.ac.nz/wand/wits/index.html – Waikato