(Enter summary)
Abstract: : The past few years have seen a rise in the popularity of the use of mentalistic
attitudes such as beliefs, desires and intentions to describe intelligent agents.
Many of the models which formalise such attitudes do not admit degrees of belief,
desire and intention. We see this as an understandable simplification, but as a simplification
which means that the resulting systems cannot take account of much of the
useful information which helps to guide human reasoning about the world. This paper... (Update)
Context of citations to this paper: More
.... of importance (because it is internal to a particular agent however inter agent messages could be augmented with a degree of belief [22] which could be based upon the weight of the relevant intra agent messages) Thus, a message from # to # offering the Nail mentioned above...
.... sets of preferences, and it is also possible to have agents modify their beliefs on the basis of the reliability of their acquaintances [14]. With this background, we can present the set of dialogue moves that we will use. For each move, we give what we call rationality rules...
Cited by: More
Modelling Dialogues Using Argumentation - Leila Amgoud Department (2000)
(Correct)
Information Sharing between Heterogeneous Uncertain.. - Luo, Zhang, Leung (2001)
(Correct)
A Hybrid Model For Sharing Information Between Fuzzy.. - Luo, Zhang, Jennings (2002)
(Correct)
Similar documents (at the sentence level):
36.8%: On using degrees of belief in BDI agents - Parsons, Giorgini (1997)
(Correct)
8.3%: Agents That Reason and Negotiate By Arguing - Parsons, Sierra, Jennings (1998)
(Correct)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.5: Multi-Context Argumentative Agents - Simon Parsons Carles (1998)
(Correct)
0.3: Position Paper - By Erik Krabbe
(Correct)
0.1: Argumentation and Multi-Agent Decision Making - Parsons (1998)
(Correct)
Similar documents based on text: More All
0.4: Representation and Reasoning for Goals in BDI Agents - Thanagarajah, Padgham, Harland
(Correct)
0.1: Robots with the Best of Intentions - Parsons, Pettersson, Saffiotti.. (1999)
(Correct)
0.0: The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency - Georgeff, Pell, Pollack.. (1999)
(Correct)
Related documents from co-citation: More All
10: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- Parsons, Sierra et al. - 1998
6: Negotiation through argumentation - a preliminary report
- Parsons, Jennings - 1996
6: Multi Agent Reasoning with Belief Contexts: the Approach and a Case Study
- Cimatti, Serafini - 1994
BibTeX entry: (Update)
S. Parsons and P. Giorgini. An approach to using degrees of belief in BDI agents. In B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager, and L. A. Zadeh, editors, Information, Uncertainty, Fusion. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/parsons99approach.html More
@misc{ parsons99approach,
author = "S. Parsons and P. Giorgini",
title = "An approach to using degrees of belief in BDI agents",
text = "S. Parsons and P. Giorgini. An approach to using degrees of belief in BDI
agents. In B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. R. Yager, and L. A. Zadeh, editors, Information,
Uncertainty, Fusion. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.",
year = "1999",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/parsons99approach.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
625
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (context) - Shafer - 1976
458
A theory of diagnosis from first principles (context) - Reiter - 1987
343
Modal Logic: An Introduction (context) - Chellas - 1980
327
Modeling Rational Agents within a BDIArchitecture
- Rao, Georgeff - 1991
260
BDI agents: From theory to practice
- Rao, Georgeff - 1995
159
the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in n..
- Dung - 1995
135
Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- Parsons, Sierra et al. - 1998
134
Labelled Deductive Systems (context) - Gabbay - 1996
125
An assumption-based TMS (context) - de Kleer - 1986
113
or: How we can do without modal logics (context) - Giunchiglia, Serafini et al. - 1994
101
Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entail.. (context) - Benferhat, Cayrol et al. - 1995
39
Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference (context) - Loui - 1987
36
How to reason defeasibly (context) - Pollock - 1992
35
A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty
- Krause, Ambler et al. - 1995
34
Formal Models and Decision Procedures for Multi-Agent System..
- Rao, Georgeff - 1995
29
Towards layered dialogical agents (context) - Noriega, Sierra - 1996
25
contradictions and practical reasoning (context) - Fox, Krause et al. - 1992
15
Deliberation and its role in the formation of intentions (context) - Rao, Georgeff - 1991
15
Belief revision through the belief function formalism in a m..
- Dragoni, Giorgini - 1996
3
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historic.. (context) - van Eemeren, Grootendorst et al. - 1996
1
Learning agents' reliability through Bayesian conditioning: ..
- Dragoni, Giorgini - 1997
1
Arguments about beliefs and actions (context) - Fox, Parsons - 1998
The graph only includes citing articles where the year of publication is known.
Documents on the same site (http://www.cs.unitn.it/~pgiorgio/publications.html): More
From Collaborative Filtering to Implicit Culture: a general .. - Blanzieri, Giorgini (2000)
(Correct)
Updating Mental States from Communication - Dragoni, Giorgini, Serafini (2000)
(Correct)
Self-Monitoring Distributed Monitoring System For Nuclear.. - Dragoni, Giorgini
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC