(Enter summary)
Abstract: Moody is right that the doctrine of conscious inessentialism (CI) is false.
Unfortunately, his zombie-based argument against (CI), once made sufficiently
clear to evaluate, is revealed as nothing but legerdemain. The
fact is, though Moody has---for reasons I explain---convinced himself otherwise,
certain zombies are impenetrable: that they are zombies, and not
conscious beings like us, is something beyond the capacity of humans to
divine.
1 Moody's Argument
Moody's argument is imaginative, but ... (Update)
Context of citations to this paper: More
...for what it is: not a serious philosophical idea but a preposterous and ignoble relic of ancient prejudices. 26] 405 6) I have elsewhere [12] discussed the penetrability of zombies, where, put roughly, the idea is that zombies are penetrated if they are unmasked as...
.... and perhaps any implemented computer program (and therefore no doubt Pollock s oscar and Bringsjord and Ferrucci s brutus (Bringsjord Ferrucci 2000)) would seem to qualify. It follows that a zombie would be A conscious. In (Bringsjord 1997c) Bringsjord argues that because...
Cited by: More
Animals, Zombanimals, and the Total Turing Test: The.. - Bringsjord, Noel.. (2000)
(Correct)
The Zombie Attack on the Computational Conception of Mind - Bringsjord (1997)
(Correct)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.2: Explaining Phi Without Dennett's Exotica: Good Ol' Computation.. - Bringsjord (1996)
(Correct)
0.2: Chess Isn't Tough Enough: Better Games for Mind-Machine.. - Bringsjord, Lally
(Correct)
0.2: Real Robots and the Missing Thought Experiment in the.. - Bringsjord, Noel (1999)
(Correct)
System load high. Please wait...
Timeout. Please try your query later.
Related documents from co-citation: More All
2: A Primer on Determinism (context) - Earman - 1986
2: Functionalism and Qualia (context) - Shoemaker - 1975
2: How to Build a Person: A Prolegomenon (context) - Pollock - 1989
BibTeX entry: (Update)
Bringsjord, S. (1995) "In Defense of Impenetrable Zombies," Journal of Consciousness Studies 2.4: 348-351. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/bringsjord95defense.html More
@misc{ bringsjord95defense,
author = "S. Bringsjord",
title = "In Defense of Impenetrable Zombies",
text = "Bringsjord, S. (1995) In Defense of Impenetrable Zombies, Journal of Consciousness
Studies 2.4: 348-351.",
year = "1995",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/bringsjord95defense.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
16
How to Program an Infinite Abacus (context) - Lambek - 1961
13
What Robots Can and Can't Be (context) - Bringsjord - 1992
6
How Could We Tell If (context) - Bringsjord - 1995
4
Consciousness by the Lights of Logic and Commonsense (context) - Bringsjord
1
Why Henrik Ibsen Threatens ComputerGenerated Literature (context) - Bringsjord
1
Dennett vs. Searle on Cognitive Science: It All Boils Down t.. (context) - Bringsjord - 1994
Documents on the same site (http://www.rpi.edu/~brings/select.html):
Computationalism is Dead; Now What? - Response to Fetzer's.. - Bringsjord (1996)
(Correct)
Chess Isn't Tough Enough: Better Games for Mind-Machine.. - Bringsjord, Lally
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC