(Enter summary)
Abstract: this paper we improve
on the proposal by Meyer et al. [13] in two ways. Firstly, and in line with the claim by Meyer et
al. [13] that the definition of an infobase as a finite set of wffs is in conflict with the intuition of
independently obtained wffs, we view an infobase as a finite sequence of wffs. This has a number of
favourable consequences. Secondly, the approach of Meyer et al. [13] associates a unique infobase
contraction and revision operation with every infobase. We generalise this... (Update)
Context of citations to this paper: More
...to ranked information states. One way of dealing with inconsistent beliefs of equal reliability is to employ the infobases of Meyer [13, 14]. An infobase is a finite multiset of sentences. 1 Intuitively an infobase is a structured representation of the beliefs of an agent with a...
...assertion. A sample of papers on base revision with further references is (Nebel 1994) Nebel 1989) Hansson 1993) Hansson 1998) (Meyer 1999). Update:Abandoning Retraction Minimality. Let us return to modelling the agent s beliefs by logically closed theories. In that...
Cited by: More
On iterated revision in the AGM framework - Herzig, Konieczny, Perrussel
(Correct)
Iterated Revision and the Axiom of Recovery: A Unified.. - Chopra, Ghose, Meyer (2002)
(Correct)
Merging Epistemic States - Meyer (2000)
(Correct)
Similar documents (at the sentence level):
27.4%: Semantic Belief Change - Meyer (1999)
(Correct)
17.6%: Basic Infobase Change - Meyer (1999)
(Correct)
6.5%: Infobase Change: A First Approximation - Meyer, Labuschagne, al. (2000)
(Correct)
Active bibliography (related documents): More All
0.0: How Hard is it to Revise a Belief Base? - Nebel (1996)
(Correct)
0.0: Vol.15 No.5 J. Cornput. Sci. Technol. Sept. 2000.. - Syntax-Independent..
(Correct)
0.0: Default Reasoning and Belief Revision: A Syntax-Independent.. - Zhang, Zhu, Chen
(Correct)
Similar documents based on text: More All
0.8: Withdrawal and Entrenchment - Meyer (2000)
(Correct)
0.5: Systematic Withdrawal - Meyer, Leenen, al. (2001)
(Correct)
0.4: A Foundationalist View of the AGM Theory of Belief Change - Bochman (1998)
(Correct)
Related documents from co-citation: More All
5: Changes on Disjunctively Closed Bases (context) - Sven - 1993
5: Two modellings for theory change (context) - Grove - 1988
4: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change (context) - Katsuno, Mendelzon - 1991
BibTeX entry: (Update)
Thomas Meyer. Basic Infobase Change. In Norman Foo, editor, Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence, volume 1747 of Lecture Notes In Artificial Intelligence, pages 156--167, Berlin, 1999. Springer-Verlag. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/meyer00basic.html More
@inproceedings{ meyer99basic,
author = "Thomas Meyer",
title = "Basic Infobase Change",
booktitle = "Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence",
pages = "156-167",
year = "1999",
url = "citeseer.ist.psu.edu/meyer00basic.html" }
Citations (may not include all citations):
193
Reasoning and Revision in Hybrid Representation Systems (context) - Nebel - 1990
72
Belief revision and default reasoning: Syntax-based approach..
- Nebel - 1991
48
Syntax-based approaches to belief revision
- Nebel - 1992
The graph only includes citing articles where the year of publication is known.
Documents on the same site (http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~tmeyer/pubs.htm): More
Merging Epistemic States - Meyer (2000)
(Correct)
Iterated Revision and the Axiom of Recovery: A Unified.. - Chopra, Ghose, Meyer (2002)
(Correct)
Infobase Change: A First Approximation - Meyer, Labuschagne, al. (2000)
(Correct)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC