Abstract:
software projects usually can’t afford to implement time-consuming and expensive tests. However, the authors show that in a surprisingly large number of cases, a small number of randomly selected tests will adequately probe the software.
Citations
|
112
|
Partition testing does not inspire confidence
– Hamlet, Taylor
- 1990
|
|
13
|
An empirical evaluation (and specification) of the all-du-paths testing criterion
– Bieman, Schultz
- 1992
|
|
9
|
An Evaluation of Software Test Environment Architectures
– Eickelmann
- 1996
|
|
9
|
Towards a Theory for Integration of Mathematical Verification and Empirical Testing
– Lowrey, Boyd, et al.
- 1998
|
|
8
|
Practical Large Scale What-if Queries: Case Studies with Software Risk Assessment
– Menzies, Sinsel
- 2000
|
|
5
|
Adequacy of limited testing for knowledge based systems
– Menzies, Cukic
- 2000
|
|
2
|
Partition vs. random testing: The influence of uncertainty
– Gutjhar
- 1999
|
|
2
|
Empirical Studies of Control Dependence Graph Size for
– Harrold, Jones, et al.
- 1998
|
|
2
|
Software Testing and Reliability,” The Handbook of Software Reliability
– Horgan, Mathur
- 1996
|
|
1
|
et al., “Testing Nondeterminate Systems,” to be published
– Menzies
- 2000
|
|
1
|
Fewer Slices of PIE: Optimizing Mutation Testing via Abduction
– Menzies, Michael
- 1999
|
