Abstract:
This note answers questions on whether three identities known to hold for orthomodular lattices are true also for ortholattices. One identity is shown to fail by MACE, a program that searches for counterexamples, an the other two are proved to hold by EQP, an equational theorem prover. The problems, from work in quantum logic, were given to us by Norman Megill.
Citations
|
263
|
Otter 3.0 Reference Manual and Guide
– McCune
- 1994
|
|
70
|
Basic Paramodulation and Superposition
– Bachmair, Ganzinger, et al.
- 1992
|
|
70
|
A Davis-Putnam program and its application to finite first-order model search
– McCune
- 1994
|
|
28
|
Otter--the CADE-13 competition incarnations
– McCune, Wos
- 1997
|
|
24
|
33 basic test problems: a practical evaluation of some paramodulation strategies
– McCune
- 1997
|
|
19
|
R.: Automated deduction in equational logic and cubic curves
– McCune, Padmanablan
- 1996
|
|
8
|
Orthomodularity is not elementary
– Goldblatt
- 1984
|
|
4
|
Binary Orthologic with Modus Ponens Is either Orthomodular or Distributive, Helv
– Pavicic, Megill
- 1998
|
|
1
|
Orthomodular structures and physical theory
– Marlow
- 1977
|
|
1
|
Correspondence by electronic mail
– Megill, Sept
- 1997
|
|
1
|
Correspondence by electronic mail. Fortunately, two of the larger equations (associativity of meet and x (y y ) = y y ) could be omitted, because they depend on the other axioms and lemmas; this allowed the search to run in less than 70 megabytes
– Megill, Sept
- 1997
|