by Martina Hasenjager, Helge Ritter
Neural Processing Letters
http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/techfak/ags/ni/publications/papers/HasenjaegerRitter1999-PLR.ps.gz
Add To MetaCart
Abstract:
Recently it was pointed out that a well-known benchmark data set, the sonar target data, indeed is linearly separable. This fact comes somewhat surprising, since earlier studies involving delta rule trained perceptrons did not achieve the separation of the training data. These results immediately raise the question of why a perceptron with a continuous activation function may fail to recognize linear separability and how to remedy this failure. The study of these issues directly leads to a performance comparison of a wide variety of different perceptron training procedures on real world data.
Citations
|
982
|
Support-vector networks
– Cortes, Vapnik
- 1995
|
|
389
|
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain
– Rosenblatt
- 1958
|
|
371
|
A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm
– Riedmiller, Braun
- 1993
|
|
223
|
Faster-Learning Variations on Back-Propagation: An Empirical Study
– Fahlman
- 1988
|
|
149
|
Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets
– Gorman, Sejnowski
- 1988
|
|
92
|
Perceptrons
– Minsky, Papert
- 1969
|
|
67
|
30 years of adaptive neural networks: Perceptron, Madaline, and backpropagation
– Widrow, Lehr
- 1990
|
|
53
|
Accelerated learning in layered neural networks
– Solla, Levin, et al.
- 1988
|
|
23
|
Optimal learning with a neural network
– Watkin
- 1993
|
|
17
|
Playing billiard in version space
– Ruján
- 1996
|
|
5
|
Characterization of the sonar signals benchmark
– Moreno, Gordon
- 1998
|
|
1
|
den Broeck, "Gradient descent learning in perceptrons: A review of its possibilities
– Bouten, Schietse, et al.
- 1958
|