| Stickel, M., Waldinger, R., Lowry, M., Pressburger, T., and Underwood, I., "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," in Proc. 12th Intl. Conf. Automated Deduction, edited by A. Bundy, Springer, 1994, vol. 814 of Lect. Notes Artificial Intelligence, pp. 341--355. |
....there may be an order of magnitude larger number of points than the same set of grids from the Overset approach. This is due to the fact that when gridding complex geometries with great disparity in spacing requirements, Overset methods can overlap grids with varied grid size. The Amphion [44] program synthesis system was applied to the domain of Overset grid generation. 5 The program synthesis system [47] generated input specifications for Chimera grid tools by reasoning over symbolic propositions defined for the geometric features of aerospace designs and Overset structured surface ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood. Deductive Com- position of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries. In Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Deduction, 1994.
....and logic programming [3] 12] 4] However, in spite of this progress, these techniques are not in the mainstream of software development. This paper describes the results of an experiment aimed at making the construction of usable deductive synthesis systems easier. Amphion [7] [14] is a real world, domainindependent program synthesis system developed by NASA. A user of an Amphion application interactively creates a formal speci cation for a program by declaring the inputs, the outputs, and relationships between them. Amphion applications take these types of speci cations ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, \Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," CADE-12, 1994.
....Wyoming 82071 October 11, 1996 sroach uwyo.edu I. INTRODUCTION Knowledge based program synthesis (KBPS) systems are systems which utilize knowledge about a particular domain in order to transform specifications into programs. Amphion is a domain independent KBPS system developed by NASA[1,5]. It is specialized to a particular domain through the creation of a declarative domain theory. One such specialization generates programs for the analysis of data collected by deep space probes. These programs consist of calls to components of the SPICE library, a publicly available library of ....
....of software libraries. The program synthesis subsystem consists of a program generator and a translator. An applicative program is generated through deductive synthesis [4] Amphion uses the Snark theorem prover, a first order logic resolution based theorem prover developed at SRI International [5], to generate a proof that the specification is a theorem of the domain theory. During a proof, substitutions are generated for existential variables through unification and equality replacement. Snark constrains the substitutions for the output variables to be terms in the applicative target ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries, CADE12, 1994.
....rewriting. Surprisingly, this simple approach has worked well for large applications. However, for smaller programs or algorithm synthesis, much more is needed. The work at Kestrel on synthesizing scheduling algorithms [6] and the synthesis and optimization of orbital algorithms at NASA Ames [20] are really impressive. They require nontrivial domain theories and a non trivial programming infrastructure. Even the simple data structures domain requires more sophistication than macros. Fig. 8. A Declarative GUI Interface for Customized IDE Specification and Generation 14 One reason for ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries", In Automated Deduction, A. Bundy, ed., Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 814.
....satisfiability procedures. We suggest that this is a large and interesting class of procedures and show how to integrate these procedures to accelerate a general purpose theorem prover doing deductive synthesis. We also describe some results we have observed from our implementation. Amphion NAIF[17] is a domain specific, high assurance software synthesis system. It takes an abstract specification of a problem in solar system mechanics, such as when will a signal sent from the Cassini spacecraft to Earth be blocked by the planet Saturn , and automatically synthesizes a FORTRAN program to ....
....of the interface and the results of using procedures like the one described in Section 5 for deductive synthesis in Amphion NAIF. Finally, Section 7 dis cusses related work and concludes. 2 Separated Inference Rules This section describes our extension to the inference rules in the SNARK [17] the orem prover enabling the use of decision procedures. The basic idea is that all clauses are separated into two parts: a part that is reasoned about by integrated decision procedures and a part that is reasoned about by SNARK. First, separated clause form is defined, and then the separated ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," CADE-12, 1994. See http://ic-www.arc.nasa.gov/ic/projects/amphion/docs/ amphion.html
....application generation technology, which produces a certification argument during the generation process. This work is an extension of previous work that uses automated theorem proving technology to generate software from subroutine libraries along with explanations of how the software was derived [11, 12]. The approach we are investigating is to use formal specifications to represent both the generic behavior of the reusable components as well as customization mechanisms that are used to integrate components into an application. Our hypothesis is that separating the specification of component ....
Stickel, M., et al. "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries", in Proc. of the 12th Conference on Automated Deduction. June 28-July 1, 1994, Nancy, France. Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 814. A. Bundy, Ed.
....program generation is not new. Already in seventies a Priz family of programming languages was developed in the Institute of Cybernetics, that allows engineers to solve their tasks using a very high level programming language. A similar approach has justi ed itself quite well in the Amphion system [2]. In this paper we introduce a methodology of extending Java programming language with capabilities of SSP. This methodology helps us to cut down the programming time and expenses, and decreases the amount of possible faults as the actual software is generated automatically. We aim to create a ....
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, I. Underwood. Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Suroutine Libraries. In: 12th Conference on Automated Deduction. A. Bundy, (ed). Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 814, 1994.
....1990s more ambitious demonstrations showed how more sophisticated programs could be generated. This involved representations of knowledge beyond low level programming knowledge, including algorithm knowledge [6] design knowledge, and domain knowledge. These demonstrations included Amphion NAIF [7], which demonstrated the generation of programs for calculating space observation geometries, and KIDS Planware [8] which generated planning and scheduling programs for military logistics support as well as other applications. Recently, the Automated Software Engineering group at NASA Ames has ....
Stickel, M., Waldinger, R., Lowry, M., Pressburger, T., Underwood, I. : Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 814. Springer-Verlag (1994).
No context found.
Stickel, M., Waldinger, R., Lowry, M., Pressburger, T., and Underwood, I., "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," in Proc. 12th Intl. Conf. Automated Deduction, edited by A. Bundy, Springer, 1994, vol. 814 of Lect. Notes Artificial Intelligence, pp. 341--355.
No context found.
Mark Stickel, Richard Waldinger, Michael Lowry, Thomas Pressburger, and Ian Underwood. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In Bundy
No context found.
M.E. Stickel. The Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries. In A. Bundy, editor, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Automated Deduction, number 814 in Lecture Notes in Arti cial Intelligence, pages 341-355. Springer-Verlag, 1994.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In A. Bundy, editor, Proc. 12th Intl. Conf. Automated Deduction, volume 814 of Lect. Notes Artifical Intelligence, pages 341--355, Nancy, June-July 1994. Springer.
No context found.
Stickel, M., Waldinger, R., Lowry, M., Pressburger T., Underwood, I.: Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Automated Deduction Springer-Verlag (1994) 341-355.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In A. Bundy, editor, 12th Conference on Automated Deduction, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 814, pages 341--355, Nancy, France, 1994. Springer-Verlag.
No context found.
Mark Stickel and Richard Waldinger. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In Twelfth International Conference on Automated Deduction, pages 341-355, June 1994.
No context found.
Mark Stickel, Richard Waldinger, Michael Lowry, Thomas Pressburger, and Ian Underwood. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In Alan Bundy, editor, Proc. 12th International Conference Automated Deduction, volume 814 of Lecture Notes in Artifical Intelligence, pages 341--355. Springer, June/July 1994.
No context found.
M. Stickel, et al., "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries", In Automated Deduction, A. Bundy, ed., Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 814.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," CADE-12, 1994. See http://icwww. arc.nasa.gov/ic/projects/amphion/docs/amphion.html
No context found.
Stickel, M.; Waldinger, R.; Lowry, M.; Pressburger T.; Underwood, I., \Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries", 12th Conference for Automated Deduction, June 28 - July 1 1994. pp 341355. 10
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, Th. Pressburger, and I. Underwood. Deductive composition of astronomical software from subroutine libraries. In A. Bundy, editor, Proc. 12th International Conference Automated Deduction, volume 814 of Lecture Notes in Arti cal Intelligence, pages 341-355. Springer, June/July 1994.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries", Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Automated Deduction, Nancy, France, June 28-July 1, 1994.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," CADE-12, 1994. See http://icwww. arc.nasa.gov/ic/projects/amphion/docs/amphion.html
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood. Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries. In A. Bundy, editor, Proc. of the 12th CADE, Nancy, number 814 in LNAI, pages 341-355. Springer, 1994.
No context found.
M. Stickel, R. Waldinger, M. Lowry, T. Pressburger, and I. Underwood, "Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries," CADE-12, 1994.
No context found.
Stickel, M., Waldinger, R., Lowry, M., Pressburger T., and Underwood, I. (1994) Deductive Composition of Astronomical Software from Subroutine Libraries. 12th Conference on Automated Deduction, Nancy, France. 341-55.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC