| Sasajima, M., Kitamura, Y, Ikeda, M., and Mizoguchi, R., FBRL:A function and behavior representation language, Proc.ofIJCAI'95, 1830--1836, 1995. |
....of the designer such as why a component exists there and which causal relations are intended . Functionality of artifacts represents a part of such designers intention so called design rationale (DR) 1,2] Thus, a lot of research has been carried out on functional representation of artifacts [3 8]. Although there is no consensus on definition of functionality of artifacts, most functional models represent intended goals or roles of the behavior and then they are dependent on the context of the components in contrast with behavioral models independent of context. A functional structure of ....
....Models of Artifacts This section overviews our approach for functional models of artifacts and framework of them as summarized as shown in Figure 1. This framework is an extended one of that of our functional modeling language FBRL (abbreviation of a Function and Behavior Representation Language) [8]. There are three axes. The horizontal one represents objective teleological interpretation, that is, from behavioral level (including structure) to functional level. In this axis, the model at the functional level consists of two layers; the base function layer and the metafunction layer. The ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; and Mizoguchi, R. 1995. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. In Proc. of IJCAI-95,
....[17] treat function as an abstraction of the behavior of a device, as does reference [18] This is entirely adequate for many purposes, but the separation of function from the object s properties will help those investigations to reach wider applicability. Among recent papers, references [19], 20] share some essential intuitions with the present paper in that they make an effort to separate the behavior of an object from its function. The present paper proposes what appears to be the simplest ontology in which this notion can be explicated, and also makes various kinds of ....
Sasajima, M., Y. Kitamura, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi, FBRL: A function and behavior representation language, in International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. 1995, IJCAI, Inc. and Morgan Kaufmann: Montreal. p. 1830-1836.
....as well as to utilize it in product conceptualization. Umeda, Y. and Tomiyama, T. 1997) explain how functional reasoning adds functional concepts to the model of an artifact and specifies the functionality of the artifact. An explicit functional model can be used to reason out the behavior. Sasajima, M. at al. 1995) developed a function and behavior representation language that represents concepts at various levels of abstraction and maps behavior of a component to a term which represents its function. Some research papers reported about the use of physical features. Physical features have been introduced ....
Sasajima, M., Kitamura. Y., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: "FBRL:A Function and Behavior Representation Language", Web-site: http://www.ei.sanken.osakau. ac.jp/pub/all-publications.html Shah, J. J., Mntyl, M., "Parametric and Feature-Based CAD/CAM", Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 1995.
....as role. The current paper synthesizes both points of view. There has been a substantial amount of recent research on representing function. We have reviewed them in [4] The notion of function as effect, one of the meanings discussed in the current paper, is close to the ideas contained in [12] [13] and [14] All these authors, in their discussion on function, focus their attention on what a device does in the external world. What we add here, as we do to the FR work, is precision in definitions by exploiting a simple ontological framework. The ontology that we have used for modeling the ....
Sasajima, M., Kitamura Y., Ikeda M., and Mizoguchi R. (1995). FBRL: A function and behavior representation language. In International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, 2, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1830-1836.
....treat function as an abstraction of the behavior of a device, as does the work of Umeda et al. [18] This is entirely adequate for many purposes, but the separation of function from the object s properties will help those investigations to reach wider applicability. Among recent papers, references [19], 20] share some essential intuitions with the present paper in that they make an effort to separate the behavior of an object from its function. The present paper proposes what appears to be the simplest ontology in which this notion can be explicated, and also makes various kinds of ....
Sasajima, M., Y. Kitamura, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi, "FBRL: A function and behavior representation language," International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence. 1995, IJCAI, Inc. and Morgan Kaufmann: Montreal. p. 1830-1836.
....(summarized in [3] and on CFRL [1, 13] 14] treats function as an abstraction of the behavior of a device, as does [15] This is entirely adequate for many purposes, but the separation of function from the object s properties will help those investigations to reach wider applicability. Recently, [16] and [17] share some essential intuitions with the present paper in that they make an effort to separate the behavior of an object from its function as the role played in the achievement of a designer s goal. The present paper proposes what appears to be the simplest ontology in which this notion ....
M. Sasajima, Y. Kitamura, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi, "FBRL: A function and behavior representation language," in International Joint Conf on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2. Montreal: IJCAI, Inc. and Morgan Kaufmann, 1995, pp. 1830-1836.
....model theory (AIM D) of which the current work is a part. In addition, Lind s approach does not account for the inherent coupling between function and the object(s) upon which the function acts. Keuneke 1991] classified functions into four types: to make, to control, to maintain and to prevent. [Sasajima et al. 1995] uses the same form but add a new to enable type. Though substantially different from others, this approach, like Lind s, still does not recognize the coupling between functions and objects. Furthermore, due to their relatively abstract nature, it is difficult to use induction to argue that the ....
Sasajima, M., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., and Mizoguchi, R. 1995. FBRL: Function and behavior representation language.
....of these reasons requires a different level of function representation. Among the many representations of function the following are outstanding for engineering design work: function as input output (Pahl Beitz 1988, Sturges(Jr. O Shaughnessy Reed 1993, Sturges, O Shaughnessy Kilani 1996, Sasajima, Kitamura, Ikeda Mizoguchi 1995), function sharing (Ulrich Seering 1988) value engineering (Miles 1972) influence diagrams representations (Sycara Navinchandra 1989, Sycara Navinchandra 1992) bond graphs (Karnopp Rosenberg 1975, Finger Rinderle 1989, Bracewell, Chaplin, Langdon, Li, Oh, Sharpe Yan 1996) ....
Sasajima, M., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M. & Mizoguchi, R. (1995). FBRL:a function and behavior representation language, Proceedings of the IJCAI '95.
No context found.
Sasajima, M., Kitamura, Y, Ikeda, M., and Mizoguchi, R., FBRL:A function and behavior representation language, Proc.ofIJCAI'95, 1830--1836, 1995.
No context found.
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; and Mizoguchi, R. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1830-1836, 1995.
No context found.
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; and Mizoguchi, R. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1830-1836, 1995.
No context found.
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; and Mizoguchi, R. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1830-1836, 1995.
....specification and has no connection with other components. The exogenous parameters are candidates of the faults in the diagnostic tasks. 3 As mentioned in No Function In Structure principle[1] function of components is contextdependent. While we discuss a functional model in another paper[9], we concentrate on the modeling at the behavior level in this paper. 4 On the assumption that the resistance R is not changed by heat. 3.3 Global Constraints and Time Scales In order to cope with global phenomena discussed in section 2.1, global constraints over local components are ....
Sasajima, M., Kitamura, Y., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language, Proc. of the IJCAI'95, pp.1830-1836 (1995).
....et al. 1993; Lee 1997) A lot of research has been carried out on functional representation of artifacts. In literature, function of an entity (a component or a system) is defined as its intended behavior (Umeda et al. 1990; Lind, 1994) interpretation of its behavior under a goal (Sasajima et al. 1995), a kind of hierarchical abstraction (Sembugamoorthy and Chandrasekaran, 1986; Vescovi et al. 1993) or effects to the environment of the entity (Chandrasekaran and Josephson, 1996) Anyway, a function of an entity represents a kind of abstraction of changes in objects associated with the entity. ....
....the rest and classify the former as types of a base function and the latter as types of a meta function. This paper proposes nine types of meta function, aiming at capturing collaboration among function. We have extended a representation language of behavior and functions of components named FBRL (Sasajima et al. 1995) in order to cope with meta functions. Such types of meta functions form part of an ontology of functional concepts (Kitamura and Mizoguchi, 1998) which provides a rich and comprehensive vocabulary for functional representation. An ontology is defined as an explicit specification of ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; and Mizoguchi, R. 1995. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. In Proc. of IJCAI-95, 1830-1836.
....a model of a plant as an active artifact. That is an ontology of function and behavior which is taskindependent. This ontology is used for deeper understanding of the dynamic characteristics of an artifact. Although it is interesting, it is omitted in this paper because of the space limitation [8][9] F unct onal expl anat on gene at o Interface Agent On t o ogy s er ver Ontology Model builder Functional explanations Functional Model Message Message Content Ope at i ona s i u at i on s expl anat on gener at o Oil refinery plant ontologies Domain Ontology Task ....
M. Sasajima, Y. Kitamura, M. Ikeda, and R. Mizoguchi, FBRL:A Function and Behavior Representation Language, Proc. of IJCAI'95, pp.1830-1836, 1995.
No context found.
Sasajima, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Ikeda, M.; Mizoguchi, R. FBRL: A Function and Behavior Representation Language. in Proceedings IJCAI-95, 1995, pp. 1830-1836.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC