| Christopher Landauer, Kirstie L. Bellman, "Knowledge-Based Integration Infrastructure for Complex Systems", International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 133-153 (1996) |
.... notation wrex as a communication language, since it is syntactically rich and semantically neutral (i.e. it allows any semantics to be exchanged among agents, because it is not interpreted by the VW) 2 Problem Posing In this section, we describe our Problem Posing Programming Paradigm [41] [42] [43] 44] 48] 51] which underlies our approach to system integration. We have defined Problem Posing as a new declarative interpretation of programs that unifies all major classes of programming. It uses what we have called Knowledge Based Polymorphism to map from problem specifications to the ....
....our computationally reflective knowledge based approach to integration infrastructure. Wrappings are an approach to the development, integration, and management of heterogeneous computing systems. In this section, we give an overview of the wrapping approach; many more details are elsewhere [42] [43] 47] and references therein) We have developed a new approach to the development, integration, and management of heterogeneous computing systems, based on two kinds of software entities: Wrapping Knowledge Bases (WKBs) and Problem Managers (PMs) 39] 8] The WKBs contain explicit, ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Christopher Landauer, Kirstie L. Bellman, "Knowledge-Based Integration Infrastructure for Complex Systems", International Journal of Intelligent Control and Systems, Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 133-153 (1996)
....interactions among the models. 5.1 Wrapping Overview Our approach to software integration is called wrapping [10] It is based on processing explicit qualitative information about all of the system components and their interconnection architecture. The wrapping theory has four basic features [11] [13] 1. ALL parts of a system architecture are , including programs, data, user interfaces, architecture and interconnection models, and everything else. 2. ALL activities in the system are , i.e. all activities a resource to a ) including user interactions, information requests and ....
....we explicitly make the entire system reflective by considering these programs that process the wrappings to be resources also, and wrapping them, so that all of our integration support processes apply to themselves, too. The entire system is therefore Computationally Reflective [19] 9] [11]. It is this ability of the system to analyze its own behavior that provides some of the power and flexibility of resource use. 6 CONCLUSION Let us leave you with a series of questions that can serve as a framework for interpreting education training applications as the VR technology matures. ....
Christopher Landauer, Kirstie Bellman, "KnowledgeBased Integration Infrastructure for Complex Systems ", , Volume 1, No. 1, pp. 133-153 (1996)
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC