Jennings, N. R.: 1993, `Commitments and conventions: the foundations of coordination in multi-agent systems'. Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223250. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
First 50 documents Next 50
Modeling Norms In Electronic Institutions - Frank Dignum Ismail (2002) (Correct)
.... On the other hand, there are more complex normative agents for multi agents systems, mainly with the purpose of reducing or transaction costs but in these agents norms are simply built in constraints in the agent s architecture [18, 19] or rules and protocols the agent necessarily applies [14]. Boman [1] introduces norms in his agent architecture to overcome serious limitations of rational decisionmaking. However, in this architecture norms act only from outside the decision maker: they don t generate goals or meta criteria to be taken into account during the decision. Either they ....
Jennings. N.R., (1993). Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 223-250.
Collective Intention Constitutes a Group - Dunin-Keplicz, Verbrugge (Correct)
....approach, groups are created on the basis of collective intentions, which are de ned in subsection 5.1, and exist as long as the collective intention between team members exists. However in this paper we abstract from the exact ways in which groups are formed, and refer the interested reader to [16, 22, 7]. As a reminder, in our approach collective intention is viewed as an inspiration for the creation of collective commitment leading directly to action execution. The creation of a collective commitment is based on the corresponding collective intention and hinges on the allocation of actions ....
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 3:223-250, 1993.
Beyond Distributed AI, Agent Teamwork in Ubiquitous - Computing Harry Chen (2002) (Correct)
....environment. With the emergence of ubiquitous computing, agents are facing a new set of challeneges, such as perception limitations, planning limiation and device mobility, when they engage in teamwork activities. 1. INTRODUCTION Teamwork has been widely studied in the fields of Distributed AI [3, 10, 4, 5, 7, 15]. Much success has been achieved in defining theoretical foundations for guiding agent cooperation and coordination in course of teamwork activities [15, 3, 9, 5] and in developing pragmatic framework for programming teamwork agents [11, 12] Numerous teamwork domains that often involve highly ....
....coming into the forth stage of the model: team action. The model simply requires that the team to be jointly intend to some appropriate action by following the specification that is defined in the Joint Intention model. In addition, the agents are also required to adapt certain social conventions [7] for monitoring their teamwork progress. The definition for team action is defined as the following: Definition: Team Action) A group g are considered a team with respect to i s goal # if and only if there is some action #, such that (1) # achieves #; and (2) g have a joint intention of #, ....
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Collective Intentions - Dunin-Keplicz (2002) (Correct)
....are defined in subsection 4.1 for the standard context and in subsection 4.2 for less ideal circumstances. A team exists as long as the collective intention between team members exists. However in this paper we abstract from the ways in which teams are formed, and refer the interested reader to [5, 9, 10, 25, 38]. As a reminder, in our approach collective intention is viewed as an inspiration for the creation of collective commitment leading directly to action execution. This is based on the linguistic tradition that intentions typically ultimately lead to actions, however, the immediate triggers of ....
Jennings, N.: Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-agent Systems, Knowledge Engineering Review, 3, 1993, 223--250.
An Organization Ontology for Enterprise Modelling - Fox, Barbuceanu, Gruninger, Lin (1997) (1 citation) (Correct)
....believed. Competency Revisited This level supports interaction through explicit linguistic actions, called speech acts. The speech act [Searle 69] framework has been developed by philosophers and linguists to account for human communication. The third level is concerned with the conventions [Jennings 93] that agents share when interacting by exchanging messages. The existence of shared conventions makes it possible for agents to coordinate in complex ways, e.g. by carrying out negotiations about their goals and actions. As an example, consider the supply chain of our TOVE virtual manufacturing ....
Jennings, N., R., (1993): Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8:3, pp 223-250, 1993.
Comparing Environments for Developing Software Agents - Eiter, Mascardi (1 citation) (Correct)
....properties. For example, if she knows that data exchange between agents is based on TCP IP, then she can avoid to re implement the basic safety mechanisms which TCP IP already ensures. Coordination protocols. Many protocols for coordination and negotiation among agents have been proposed (see [40] and [47] for an introduction to the topic) the availability of a library of coordination protocols in a MASDK avoids to re invent or just re implement already developed strategies. Human agent interaction. In order to develop agents which intelligently interact with human beings [49] ....
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
The Dynamic Selection of Coordination Mechanisms - Excelente-Toledo, Jennings (2004) Self-citation (Jennings) (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, "Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems," Knowl. Eng. Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 223--250, 1993.
Learning When and How to Coordinate - Excelente-Toledo, Jennings Self-citation (Jennings) (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Performance Competitions as Research Infrastructure: - Large Scale Comparative (Correct)
No context found.
Jennings, N. R.: 1993, `Commitments and conventions: the foundations of coordination in multi-agent systems'. Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223250.
Towards Commitments for Situated Agents - Weyns, Steegmans, Holvoet (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings, "Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-agent Systems", The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2(3), 1993.
On Commitments, Roles and Obligations - Fasli (2001) (Correct)
No context found.
N.R.Jennings(1993). Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol.8:3, pp. 223-250.
Coordination Specification In Multi-Agent Systems . . . - Perini, al. (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Normative Agent Reasoning in Dynamic Societies - Lopez, Luck, al. (2004) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Centro Per La Ricerca - Scientifica Tecnologica Povo (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, `Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems', The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3), 223--250, (1993).
Planning and Representation of Joint Human-Agent Space.. - Siebra, Tate, Queiroz (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings, Commitments and conventions: the foundation of coordination in multiagent systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8, 1994.
Monitoring Agents Using Declarative Planning - Dix, Eiter, Fink (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Modelling Norms for Autonomous Agents - Lopez, Luck (2003) (3 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
From Local Behaviors to Global Performance in a Multi-Agent.. - Bingcheng Hu Jiming (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223 -- 250, 1993.
On Identifying and Managing Relationships in Multi-Agent Systems - Ronald Ashri And (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of co-ordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3):223--250, 1993.
Monitoring Agents Using Declarative Planning - Dix, al. (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Jennings, N. R.: Commitments and Conventions: The Foundation of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 8(3), 1993, 223--250.
Enterprise Formation Mechanisms Based on Mobile Agents - Ambroszkiewicz.. (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
N. R. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The Foundations of Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems, Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 1993, pp. 223-250.
Modelling Social Agents: Towards Deliberate Communication - Dignum (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The foundation of coordination in Multi-Agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8(3), pages 223-250, 1993.
Motivational Attitudes of Agents: On Desires, Obligations.. - Dignum, Kinny, Sonenberg (Correct)
No context found.
N. Jennings. Commitments and Conventions: The foundation of coordination in Multi-Agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 8(3), pages 223-250, 1993.
Performance Competitions as Research Infrastructure: - Large Scale Comparative (Correct)
No context found.
Jennings, N. R.: 1993, `Commitments and conventions: the foundations of coordination in multi-agent systems'. Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3), 223250.
Multiagent Systems as Spheres of Commitment Munindar P. Singh - Department Of Computer (Correct)
No context found.
Jennings, N. R.; 1993. Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 8(3):223--250.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC