Saussure F. de (1915), "Cours de linguistique gnrale", Payot, Paris. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Markedness and Agreement - Blevins (2000) (1 citation) (Correct)
....features of the post Bloomfieldian analytical tradition. The use of essentially taxonomic feature systems provides no formal distinction between traditionally unmarked values like 3rd , sg or and marked values like 1st , pl or . Moreover, although most contemporary accounts follow Saussure 1916 in according primacy to synchronic over diachronic description, they largely suppress the associative or paradigmatic dimension that Saussure viewed as a central component of a synchronic system. The purely syntagmatic accounts developed within the post Bloomfieldian tradition accordingly lack ....
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique gnrale. Paris: Payot. Edited by Wade Bally and Albert Schehaye.
Extending Software Through Metaphors and Metonymies - Barbosa, al. (2001) (Correct)
....by metaphorical and metonymic chain classifications. In order to describe how the domain and application models must be represented, we first need to understand what is a user utterance, and what variations of literal utterances we want to interpret. A user utterance is a syntagmatic expression [23], a linearized rule based combination of elements in the user interface language. The interaction paradigm determines the form of the expression, like object verb and verb object, for instance. A literal utterance has a clear, direct and unambiguous interpretation, derived from the language ....
Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de Linguistique Gnrale. Paris, Payot.
Levels of Representation and Levels of Analysis for the .. - Hirst, Di Cristo.. (2000) (5 citations) (Correct)
....Representations at all intermediate levels must be interpretable at both adjacent levels : the more abstract and the more concrete. There is nothing in what we have said so far which is specific to intonation. In the case of lexical items, for example, this framework embodies the insights of de Saussure 1916concerning the double nature of the linguistic sign as an arbitrary association between signifiant and signifi. In the case of prosody and intonation, we can usefully make a similar distinction between functional representations which encode the information necessary for the syntactic and semantic ....
Saussure, F. (de) 1916. Cours de Linguistique Gnrale. Paris, Payot.
The Acquisition of Word Meaning through Global Lexical.. - Li, Burgess, Lund (2000) (Correct)
.... to Saussure, the function of a given linguistic entity (e.g. a word) is defined entirely by reference to the complex relationships that hold between this entity and other entities, much like that the role of a chess piece is determined by its relationship with other pieces on the chessboard (Saussure, 1916). It is further true, argued Saussure, that it does not matter what materials make the entities or the pieces, as long as their structural relationships can be clearly defined. Saussure s arguments on structural properties of linguistic units bear striking similarity to modern day theories of ....
Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique gnrale. Paris: Payot. (English translation: A course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library; Chinese translation: Putong Yuyanxue Daolun. Beijing: Peking University Press).
The Context of Conversations - Weigand, Hoppenbrouwers, de Moor (Correct)
....is exchanged. At the essential level, we focus on what communication brings about, on what has effect in the intersubjective world 1 . Note that the documentary level and informational level together make up what is traditionally called the sign as a combination of a token and a signifier (de Saussure, 1916). Linguistic acts (referring, predicating) are performed by means of utterance acts (Searle, 1969) Linguistic acts themselves are instrumental in the execution of speech acts (Weigand, Hoppenbrouwers, 1998) We claim that context can also be viewed on these three levels: 8 #r # h# #ur ....
Saussure, F. de (1916): Cours de linguistique gnrale. Paris: Payot.
Investigating Syllabic Structure And Its Variation In Speech - From French Radio (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
Saussure F. de (1915), "Cours de linguistique gnrale", Payot, Paris.
Lernen paradigmatischer Relationen auf iterierten.. - Biemann, Bordag, Quasthoff (Correct)
No context found.
Saussure, F de. (1916) : Cours de Linguistique Gnrale, Paris, Payot
Three Principled Methods of Automatic Word Form Recognition - Hausser (1999) (Correct)
No context found.
Saussure, F. de (1972) Cours de linguistique gnrale, dition critique prpare par Tullio de Mauro, ditions Payot, Paris.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC