Golin, E. J., "Tool Review: Prograph 2.0 from TGS Systems," Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, pp. 189-194, 1991. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Agentsheets: A Tool for Building Domain-Oriented Dynamic, Visual .. - Repenning (1993) (15 citations) (Correct)
....useful to conceptualize a wide variety of problems. The kind of programming substrates that I am interested in should provide a versatile construction paradigm to build dynamic, visual tools for problem domains such as: Artificial Life Environments [59] Visual Programming Languages [12, 26, 41, 45, 58, 62, 79, 106] . Programmable Drawing Tools [23] Simulation Environments [24, 107, 113, 117] 37 . Games [54] Complex Cellular Automata [112] Spreadsheet Extensions [33, 55, 68, 81, 84, 90, 108] All these domains have the following characteristics in common: They are visual: Certain pertinent ....
Golin, E. J., "Tool Review: Prograph 2.0 from TGS Systems," Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, pp. 189-194, 1991.
Bending Icons: Syntactic and Semantic Transformations of Icons - Repenning (1994) (3 citations) (Correct)
....through direct manipulation. Agents can be animated, move among cells, play sounds, and use speech synthesis. Metaphors of Flow Many Agentsheets applications revolve around the metaphor of flow [6] Flow is an important concept in many different visual programming approaches such as Prograph [5], HI Visual [16] and Khoros [11] To create the set of required icons representing components such as pipes or roads connecting neighboring cells is laborious. In Figure 2 the icon in cell 5, representing a railway track, implies a connection between cells 4 and 6. In order to express all ....
Golin, E. J., "Tool Review: Prograph 2.0 from TGS Systems," Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, pp. 189-194, 1991. 303
Behavior Processors: Layers between End-Users and Java.. - Repenning, Ioannidou (1997) (4 citations) (Correct)
....intricate process for that they see little hope of achieving. The following discussion refers to these kind of forced programmers, but by no means implies that visual programming should completely focus on them. In the past, some visual programming environments such as LabView [8] and Prograph [6] have successfully supported skilled programmers. Who is the programmer With the next millennium in sight, the visual languages community is starting to take inventory of its successes and failures in order to develop new directions in which research can explore new ideas to increase the ....
....for end users. Comparable trap door mechanism in systems such as Rehearsal World [4] or ThingLab [3] also provide access to the underlying programming language Smalltalk in both case but do not include end user interface generators to wrap up new language pieces. LabView [8] and Prograph [6] provide interactors for individual data types (e.g. a push button switch for a boolean type) but do not aid the mapping of entire type signatures. Layer 3: Making Type Interactors Agentsheets allows the design of custom type interactors. A large set of built in parameter types, such as the ....
Golin, E. J., "Tool Review: Prograph 2.0 from TGS Systems," Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, pp. 189-194, 1991.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC