| Walker, Rachel. 1998. Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity Effects. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz. |
....antagonism. All other things being equal, raising the tongue body lowers the first formant (F1) of a vowel. But, again all other things being equal, retracting the tongue root raises F1. 3. In our WCCFL talk, we compared the present analysis of vowel transparency with the analysis proposed by Walker (1998) within Sympathy Theory (McCarthy 1999) Space limitations preclude us from making this comparison here. Bakovic and Wilson 47 Therefore, when raising of the body and retraction of the root occur simultaneously, the result is an intermediate F1 value that does not provide a strong acoustic cue ....
Walker, Rachel. 1998. Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity Effects. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
....2 of prosodic development have restrictions on word size. Initially, the child s production is limited to a syllable and, at stage 2, the restriction is weakened to a foot. These size restrictions on the child s productions are due to alignment constraints (McCarthy Prince 1995, Spaelti 1997, Walker 1998, Curtin to appear) 2 . 2) ALL s LEFT: Align(s,Left,PrWd,Left) Align all syllables to the left edge of the Prosodic Word. ALL FT LEFT: Align(Ft,Left,PrWd,Left) Align all feet to the left edge of the Prosodic Word. The ranking of ALL s LEFT with respect to ALL FT LEFT determines the size ....
Walker, R. (1998). Nasalization, neutral segments, and opacity effects.
No context found.
Walker, R. 1997. Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity Effects. Ph.D. dissertation.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC