Sadeh, N.; Hildum, D.; Laliberty, T.; McA'Nulty, J.; Kjenstad, D. and Tseng, A. (1998). Blackboard Architecture for Integrating Process Planning and Production Scheduling, In: Concurrent Engineering: Research & Appl. (CERA), 6(2), pp. 88-100.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....The possibility of disturbances and the uncertainty of local information require a constant co ordination of the distributed information sources to keep them consistent. 5. 1 Approach to the scheduling problem Several approaches to overcome isolated local scheduling have been presented (e.g. Sadeh et al. 1998). Thus, the aim of the here presented scheduling concept is not the development of an independent, monolithic solution for decentralised scheduling, but rather an integration of existing local order planning and control systems. Currently these systems are acting independently. The purpose of the ....

Sadeh, N.M. et. al. (1998). A blackboard architecture for integrating process planning and production scheduling. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 6, No. 2. pp. 88-100.

.... In RealPlan PP, we essentially perform a type of multi module dependency directed backtracking approach that is a variation on the hybrid planning methodology developed in [21] and is also akin to the approach used to link satisfiability and linear programming solvers in [54] In Sadeh et al.[46], a blackboard based architecture called IP3S is presented for integrating process planning and production scheduling. However, the system relies on the user to select different process plan in the event of scheduling failure while in RealPlan PP, the planner can automatically generate a different ....

Sadeh, N., Hildum, D., Laliberty, T., McA'Nulty, J., Kjenstad, D., and Tseng, A. A Blackboard Architecture for Integrating Process Planning and Production Scheduling. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 6, No. 2. 1998.

....on the load of a particular bottleneck facility through interaction with the agent responsible for that facility. 2. Integration with Heterogeneous Planning and Scheduling Modules: Each MASCOT agent is configured around a blackboard architecture [Erman et al. 1980, Lesser and Corkill, 1983, Sadeh et al. 1998] that allows for the easy integration of multiple planning and scheduling modules (including possible legacy systems) along with analysis and coordination modules. Within a given agent, these modules can be activated to develop and revise integrated planning and scheduling solutions stored in a ....

....to another depending on the facility(ies) for which the agent is responsible and the level at which it operates within the architecture. Typically, low level facility based agents might include a process planning processselection module and a production scheduling module, as in the IP3S system [Sadeh et al. 1998] . Higher level agents (e.g. MPS level or equivalent) will typically combine high level scheduling and capacity allocation modules with high level process flow bill of material development modules to support alternative make or buy outsourcing decisions. 3. Mixed Initiative Decision Support ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

N. M. Sadeh, D. W. Hildum, T. J. Laliberty, J. McA'Nulty, D. Kjenstad, and A. Tseng. A blackboard architecture for integrating process planning and production scheduling. Concurrent Engineering: Research & Applications (CERA), 6(2):88--100, June 1998.

....order on the load of a particular bottleneck facility through interaction with the agent responsible for that facility. 2. Integration with Heterogeneous Planning and Scheduling Modules: Each MASCOT agent is configured around a blackboard architecture [Erman et al. 1980, Lesser and Corkill, 1983, Sadeh et al. 1998] that allows for the easy integration of multiple planning and scheduling modules (including possible legacy systems) along with analysis and coordination modules. Within a given agent, these modules can be activated to develop and revise integrated planning and scheduling solutions stored in a ....

....to another depending on the facility(ies) for which the agent is responsible and the level at which it operates within the architecture. Typically, low level facility based agents might include a process planning processselection module and a production scheduling module, as in the IP3S system [Sadeh et al. 1998] . Higher level agents (e.g. MPS level or equivalent) will typically combine high level scheduling and capacity allocation modules with high level process flow bill of material development modules to support alternative make or buy outsourcing decisions. 3. Mixed Initiative Decision Support ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

N. M. Sadeh, D. W. Hildum, T. J. Laliberty, J. McA'Nulty, D. Kjenstad, and A. Tseng. A blackboard architecture for integrating process planning and production scheduling. Concurrent Engineering: Research & Applications (CERA), 6(2):88--100, June 1998.

No context found.

Sadeh, N.; Hildum, D.; Laliberty, T.; McA'Nulty, J.; Kjenstad, D. and Tseng, A. (1998). Blackboard Architecture for Integrating Process Planning and Production Scheduling, In: Concurrent Engineering: Research & Appl. (CERA), 6(2), pp. 88-100.

No context found.

Sadeh, N., Hildum, D. W., Laliberty, T. J., McAnulty, J., Kjenstad, D. und Tseng, A.: A Blackboard Architecture for Integrating Process Planning and Production Scheduling. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 6 (2), 1998.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC