| D. Bailey, J. Feldman, S. Narayanan, and G. Lakoff. Modeling Embodied Lexical Development, ICSI, UC Berkeley, 1997. |
....planning and controlling actions can also motivate and ground simple analyses of a number of linguistic phenomena. Our work extends M S s analysis by providing an active computational model with motivated constraints on aspectual coercion and a more precise description of inter event contingency. (Bailey et al. 1997; Narayanan, 1997a; Narayanan, 1997b) introduced our basic computational model of verbs and events, motivated by recent results in biological control theory. A novel feature of the model is an event representation called an executing schema, or x schema, an extension of the Petri net formalism ....
Bailey, D. R., Feldman, J. A., Narayanan, S., and Lakoff, G. (1997). Modeling embodied lexical development.
No context found.
Bailey,D.R.,Feldman, J. A., Narayanan, S., and Lako#, G. #1997#. Modeling embodied lexical development. In Proceedings of the 19th Cognitive ScienceSociety Conference.
....planning and controlling actions can also motivate and ground simple analyses of a number of linguistic phenomena. Our work extends M S s analysis byproviding an active computational model with motivated constraints on aspectual coercion and a more precise description of inter event contingency. #Bailey et al. 1997; Narayanan, 1997a; Narayanan, 1997b# introduced our basic computational model of verbs and events, motivated by recent results in biological control theory.Anovel feature of the model is an event representation called an executing schema, or x schema, an extension of the Petri net formalism ....
Bailey, D. R., Feldman, J. A., Narayanan, S., and Lako#, G. #1997#. Modeling embodied lexical development.
....of shruti shruti was initially developed to model our remarkable ability to draw common sense inferences with reference to a large body of semantic, episodic, and causal knowledge. Subsequently, work on language acquisition, especially early language acquisition in children [FLB 96, Nar97a, BFNL97] lead us to the realization that bodily grounded representations of actions must play a crucial role in supporting a variety of common sense inference. This realization was based in part on the insight that the very representation used for carrying out an action must also subserve the ....
....label them. This same weakness appears as a technical consequence of using back propagation in PDP models: even when the network learns perfectly how to classify a domain, it has no mechanism for executing the action. As pointed out in Sect. 2, a crucial insight resulting from the NTL project [BFNL97, Nar97a] is that the meaning of motion and manipulation words (such as pull, push, walk, run, stumble and fall) are grounded in x schemas for carrying out the action. Different action verbs and associated grammatical devices (e.g. adverbs and prepositions) express parameters of the underlying ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
David R. Bailey, Jerome A. Feldman, Srini Narayanan, and George Lakoff. Modeling embodied lexical development. In Proceedings of the 19th Cognitive Science Society Conference, pages 19--24, 1997.
No context found.
D. Bailey, J. Feldman, S. Narayanan, and G. Lakoff. Modeling Embodied Lexical Development, ICSI, UC Berkeley, 1997.
No context found.
D. Bailey, Feldman J., S. Narayanan, and G. Lakoff. Modeling embodied lexical development. In Proceedings of the 19 Cognitive Science Society Conference, pages ??--?? Stanford University Press, 1997.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC