| Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, Apr. 1995. |
....extra integrity control value. This integrity control value allows legitimate principals to detect, after decryption, modifications on the original data contents. There are two basic ways to handle integrity control values: 1. They are generated using a one way hash function (e.g. MD5 [9] or SHA [11]) from all the bits of the original or recovered plaintext data independently of the encryption decryption algorithm [13, 3, 2, 1] 2. They are predefined values, which may be set up in many different ways: agreed between interacting peers, derived from a secret value, like the encryption key, or ....
....observed in the measurements obtained in the simulations with the cold cache is due to the fact that we execute less function calls to encode decode all the 160 M blocks. Comparing with EPBC, we can see that this is 6.3 to 10.9 times faster than the combination of CBC and MD5. If we had used SHA [11] instead of MD5, the performance gain would probably be greater. According to a table presented by Schneier [10] for a 486 SX processor, the SHA function is about two times slower than MD5. 5 Conclusions In this document we presented a new encryption mode, Efficient ErrorPropagating Block ....
Secure Hash Standard. NIST FIPS PUB 180, April 1993.
....should not output Key(p) Mp as the key for program p, since the video encryption algorithm may preserve some linearity. Rather, the encryption key should be h(Key(p) where h(x) is a member of a universal family of hash function (cf. Lub96, ch. 8] Practical choices may be MD5 [Riv92] or SHA [SHA93]. By this the linearity is destroyed before the key is used in the fast video encryption algorithm. This is also important in order to prevent pirates who buy a package which is a subspace of dimension r from learning all the keys in the subspace by extracting only r keys from the secure module ....
Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180, U.S. Department of Commerce, May 1993.
....Code (MAC) for integrity control, and records are encrypted using CBC. MACs 4 By means of environment variables and configuration files. 5 Value that in theory was never used before. are generated from the corresponding messages using MD5 or SHA one way digest hashing functions [9, 12]. Unfortunately, with current software implementations, the time consumed in computing MACs using MD5 or SHA is not negligible when compared with the time consumed in IDEA encrypt decrypt operations. In PES we use a cipher mode similar to the one used in SSL. First the message is packed into a ....
Secure Hash Standard. NIST FIPS PUB 180, Washington D.C., USA, April 1993.
No context found.
Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, Apr. 1995.
No context found.
Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, April 1995.
No context found.
Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, Apr. 1995.
No context found.
Secure hash standard. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180-1, U.S. Department of Commerce, April 1995.
No context found.
Secure Hash Standard. NIST FIPS PUB 180, April 1993.
No context found.
, Secure Hash Standard,May 1993. #19# National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. NIST FIPS PUB
No context found.
"Secure Hash Standard", National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180, U.S. Department of Commerce, May 1993
No context found.
"Secure Hash Standard", National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST FIPS PUB 180, U.S. Department of Commerce, May 1993
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC