Munindar P. Singh. Commitments in the architecture of a limited, rational agent. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical and Practical Foundations of Intelligent Agents, pages 72--87. Springer-Verlag, 1997. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
The Bases of Effective Coordination in Decentralized.. - Rustogi, Singh (1999) Self-citation (Singh) (Correct)
....the agent s choice the lower its commitment to a particular decision. Previous experimental work by Kinny Georgeff [8] and Pollack et al. 11] appears especially relevant. However, there is more structure to commitments that the present setup does not capture; some of this is discussed in [17]. We mention some high level open issues that would extend the experiments described above. Although not as detailed as hypotheses, they can be studied in variations of the present experiments. I1. The improvement in speed with a nonzero band suggests a natural trade off between the time taken ....
Munindar P. Singh. Commitments in the architecture of a limited, rational agent. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical and Practical Foundations of Intelligent Agents, pages 72--87. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Semantical Considerations on Intention Dynamics for BDI Agents - Singh (1997) (3 citations) Self-citation (Singh) (Correct)
....then he cannot intend p. This inference might be termed consequential anti closure: a most unusual problem for a logic of cognitive concepts 4.4 Commitments Instead of trying to work around consequential anti closure, we formalize the above requirement using commitments [Bratman, 1987, ch. 2] [Singh, 1996] . An agent has an intention only as long as he is committed to it. This notion of commitment is internal or mental, and must be carefully distinguished from social commitment, which is also discussed in the AI literature [Castelfranchi, 1995; Singh, 1998] As before, let q entail p. ....
....postulates for belief revision due to [G ardenfors, 1988] However, he does not propose any postulates involving intentions, as we have attempted to do. Instead, Wobcke offers only specific examples of planning that involve adopting additional intentions based on current intentions and beliefs. [Singh, 1996] develops a utility based approach to commitments and precommitments. Singh attempts to formalize the conditions under which an agent should deliberate and the conative policies that affect when and how that deliberation is carried out. The present approach addresses the key postulates on ....
Munindar P. Singh. Commitments in the architecture of a limited, rational agent. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Theoretical and Practical Foundations of Intelligent Agents, pages 72--87. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC