J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....the consequent obligation. Often agent j can also not check the authority directly. Therefore, we think that in each protocol it should be possible for j to question the authority of i if j cannot check this authority himself. This is conform the theory from Habermas about communication protocols [10] where this is classi ed as an attack on the validity claims. Agent j can attack the validity of the authority of i by directing agent i to make the authority available for inspection of agent j. We get the following possibilities: 1. auth(i; DIR(authority; i; j; OPP (auth(i; ....

J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.

....by Winograd and Flores [1986] and Winograd [1988] The theoretical foundation of LAP is a.o. constituted by the Speech Act Theory Activity patterns in health care The Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling 2001 73 [Austin, 1962; Searle, 1969] and the Theory of Communicative Action [Habermas, 1984]. DEMO identifies three different levels of abstraction in an organization. At the highest level, also called the essential level, organizations are viewed as networks of actors where an actor is defined as a particular amount of authority and corresponding responsibility. These actors create new ....

J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.

....It is the name of a crossdisciplinary theory about the dynamics of organizations, as well as an analysis method based on that theory. The disciplines on which it draws are the philosophical branches of semantics and scientific ontology [1] and the social theory grounded in language philosophy [8,17]. Next to these it incorporates the discrete dynamic system theory as described in [3] If informatics is understood to be the interdisciplinary field of science that deals with information and communication and their role in the functioning of dynamic systems, especially organizations, then the ....

....when engaged in a transaction. The transaction process structure is expressed in speech acts. The model is a generic model applicable to performative communication in all kinds of organizations. The core of the model is formed by the transaction concept and Habermas theory of communicative action [8,9]. Central to Habermas theory is the distinction between instrumental, strategic and communicative action [8, pp. 285 286] Given the nature of the organizational problems we consider, we only focus on strategic and communicative action. When we combine the action types with the transaction ....

Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume One, Boston, Beacon, 1984.

....for CIA s that integrates much of our previous work. Our starting point remains the linguistic theory of Functional Grammar [Dik, 1989] including its theory of the Lexicon. We also use the theory of speech acts as developed by Searle ( Searle, 1969] Searle and Vanderveken, 1985] and Habermas ([Habermas, 1984]) We argue that the Language Action perspective can be fruitfully applied to CIA design. The structure of this paper is as follows: in section 2, we present the general framework of a Cooperative Information Agent. In section 3, we present the Information and Communication component of the agent. ....

....agent, and other agents can access it according to their authorizations. So the technical architecture can be the same, but with a different division of tasks. agent CIA CIA CIA CIA figure 2. Communicating agents The framework can be related to Habermas theory of communicative action [Habermas, 1984]. When involved in communicative action (as opposed to strategic action) the participants are oriented towards mutual agreement. It is considered essential that the participants achieve a common definition of the situation in which they find themselves. The CIA framework materializes this common ....

. J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume One, Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

....the consequent obligation. Often agent j can also not check the authority directly. Therefore, we think that in each protocol it should be possible for j to question the authority of i if j cannot check this authority himself. This is conform the theory from Habermas about communication protocols [11] where this is classified as an attack on the validity claims. Agent j can attack the validity of the authority of i by directing agent i to make the authority available for inspection of agent j. We get the following possibilities: 1. auth(i; DIR(authority; i; j; ff) OPP (auth(i; DIR(authority; ....

J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.

....of Functional Grammar [7] including its theory of the Lexicon, plays a crucial role in the organization of the information towards the other CIA s. One could say that the LIM s of our CIA s are based on this theory. We use the theory of speech acts as developed by Searle [19, 20] and Habermas [9] to describe the communication itself. Because a CIA must be able to reason about its tasks and the information that is possesses we think it is crucial that there is an underlying formal theory in which the agents can be described (including the communication) We have described this theory in a ....

Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume One, Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

....of autonomy , that of trust is not appropriate when applied to technology. We have to be careful both in applying the cause effect models of physical systems appropriate to technology to society, and also in applying such social constructs as trust to the physical systems underlying technology. Habermas (1981) has emphasized the essential differences between the dynamics of society and that of physical systems. The laws that govern human behavior are largely conventions embedded in our society and propagated through our culture. They do not have the necessity of the laws underlying physical systems ....

Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

....are modelled at the IS level only. To provide an abstraction from organisation processing structures, a new class of techniques, sometimes referred to as communication based techniques, has been spawned by the work of [FL80] based on the speech act theory of [Sea69] The speech act revisions of [Hab84] have been adopted by more recent such techniques, e.g. the Actor Bank Channel communication modelling technique [Die94] of the DEMO method. In it, the pattern of performative (state changing) conversations between actors is used to derive interaction structures for communication units known as ....

J. Habermas. The Theory for Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalization of Society, volume 1. Boston Beacon Press, 1984.

....of the CIA to communicate and negotiate take an important place we claim that the influence of linguistics for these systems should go beyond that of a natural language interface. We use a language action perspective [10] based on the speech act theory as developed by Searle [15, 16] and Habermas [12]) to describe the communication itself and guide the architecture. In contrast to traditional data flows the language action perspective emphasizes what agents (human or automated) do while communicating and how communication brings about a coordination of their activities. The focus is on ....

J. Habermas. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume One. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

No context found.

Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

No context found.

Habermas, J. (1984b). The theory of communicative action -- reason and the rationalisation of society (Vol. I). Beacon Press, Boston, MA.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC