B. N. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. F. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for ip delivery. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2000.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....(sourthern) group, and executives access updates for both groups. The advantages of proper data centric design include: ffl Reduced server processing cost Since the number and composition of datagroups is tunable, fixing the number of update logs generated controls server processing cost[19]. 2 ffl Reduced disk storage cost Since the composition of datagroups is tunable, redundancy in their contents can be eliminated. This allows for elimination of redundant contents in their corresponding update logs[20] ffl Reduced transmission cost Individual datagroups can be designed so ....

....techniques to reduce communication costs. These works focus on availability and communication costs, assume high participation between the client and the server during synchronization phases, which we consider unscalable as the number of clients increases. Recent work in update propagation [19, 20] recognizes possible savings in server or network costs by considering receiver interests in the delivery of updates, but these works leave out the problem of designing the update objects. To our knowledge, ours is the first work that analyzes the cost components of this architecture. Finally, ....

B. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for IP delivery. Proc. Infocomm, March 2000.

....with these mechanisms. Note that the amount of state and processing required at a router is associated with the granularity of forwarding requested. We can apply clustering to group approximately similar requests at the application level to reduce load at the network level. Levine et al. [12] discuss issues on considering receiver interest in multicast content delivery. The authors conclude that the current IP Multicast architecture is inadequate to handle large scale applications that use multiple multicast groups. An addressable routing infrastructure which supports low latency ....

LEVINE, B., CROWCROFT, J., DIOT, C., GARCIA-LUNA-ACEVES, J., AND KUROSE, J. Consideration of Receiver Interest in Content for IP Delivery. Tech. rep., University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999. Submitted for publication.

....new services. Additionally, the amount of state and processing required at the routers is associated with the granularity of forwarding. We can apply clustering to group approximately similar forwarding requests at the application level, thus decreasing load at the network level. Levine et.al. [19] suggests using addressable routing [18] to consider receiver interest in IP delivery. While this works well if interest correlates to topology, a hybrid scheme that uses clustering is necessary otherwise. The authors conclude that low latency address allocation and group creation should be ....

Levine, B., Crowcroft, J., Diot, C., Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J., and Kurose, J. Consideration of Receiver Interest in Content for IP Delivery. Tech. rep., University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999. Submitted for publication.

....and rendezvous information are all specified in ASCII text. This simplifies message construction and the prototyping process. Also, this allows the preference functions supplied by the applications to be easily written and changed in OTcl. 7 Related Work A recent paper by Levine et.al. [19] suggests using addressable routing [18, 11] to consider receiver interest in IP delivery. While this works well if interest correlates to topology, a hybrid scheme is clustering is necessary otherwise. The authors conclude that low latency address allocation and group creation should be supported ....

Levine, B., Crowcroft, J., Diot, C., Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J., and Kurose, J. Consideration of Receiver Interest in Content for IP Delivery. Tech. rep., University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999. Submitted for publication.

....based on the preference clustering. The entity based protocol is an extreme case of the preference clustering approach where the number of clusters equals to the number of entities. Other efforts that try to avoid broadcasting and filtering all the data at end host include interest based filtering [13] and Locales and Beacons [14] The former approach uses a network layer protocol [15] to address data to the interested hosts. The latter divides the virtual world into locales which can be communicated independently and use beacons to find the locale in which an object resides. Our work is ....

....[14] The former approach uses a network layer protocol [15] to address data to the interested hosts. The latter divides the virtual world into locales which can be communicated independently and use beacons to find the locale in which an object resides. Our work is complementary to the work in [13] as we focus on the control cost of group formation, not just the data messages sent. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In section 2 we describe the cell based grouping and entitybased grouping concepts and some analytical results. Then in section 3, we examine static models for the ....

B. N. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. F. Kurose, "Consideration of receiver interest in content for IP delivery." Submitted for Publication, 1999.

.... An approach similar to our cell based grouping strategy has been studied by Van Hook et al. 6, 7] They evaluated the approach using log files of DIS based simulations [8, 9] Other efforts that try to avoid broadcasting and filtering all the data at end host include interest based filtering [10] and Locales and Beacons [11] The former approach uses a network layer protocol [12] to address data to the interested hosts. The latter divides the virtual world into locales which can be communicated independently and use beacons to find the locale in which an object resides. Our work is ....

....[11] The former approach uses a network layer protocol [12] to address data to the interested hosts. The latter divides the virtual world into locales which can be communicated independently and use beacons to find the locale in which an object resides. Our work is complementary to the work in [10] as we focus on the control cost of group formation, not just the data messages sent. The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In section 2 we describe the cell based grouping and entity based grouping concepts. Then in section 3, we examine static models for the both strategies. This is ....

B. N. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. F. Kurose, "Consideration of receiver interest in content for IP delivery." Submitted for Publication, 1999.

No context found.

B. N. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. F. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for ip delivery. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2000.

No context found.

B. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C.Diot, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for ip delivery. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000.

No context found.

B. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C.Diot, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for ip delivery. In Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000.

No context found.

B. Levine, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and J. Kurose. Consideration of receiver interest in content for ip delivery. Submitted for publication, January 1999.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC