| Schoemaker, L., Nijtmans, J., Camurri, A., Lavagetto, F., Morasso, P., t, C.B., GuiardMarigny, T., Goff, B.L., Robert-Ribes, J., Adjoudani, A., Defee, I., Munch, S., Hartung, K., Blauert, J.: A taxonomy of multimodal interaction in the human information processing system. Technical report, ESPRIT BRA, No. 8579 (1995) |
....applications more productive. Although Cohen is primarily concerned with immersive applications we feel that multimodal interaction is important in other environments as well. An interesting view to human computer interaction is given by Schoemaker et al. who have studied the levels of observation[4]. Their work classifies four levels of observation physical physiological, information theoretical, cognitive and intentional. Many user input toolkits work on the information theoretical level of this model they are only concerned with raw input data or simple manipulation of the input ....
Schoemaker, L., Nijtmans, J., Camurri, A., Lavagetto, F., Morasso, P., t, C.B., GuiardMarigny, T., Goff, B.L., Robert-Ribes, J., Adjoudani, A., Defee, I., Munch, S., Hartung, K., Blauert, J.: A taxonomy of multimodal interaction in the human information processing system. Technical report, ESPRIT BRA, No. 8579 (1995)
....model of fusion and the divergent model of orthogonal axes. REVIEW OF MULTIMODAL INTERACTION Multimodal interaction can be separated into a humancentered view and a system centered view. The former is rooted in perception and communications channels exploring modes of human input output [2]. The systemcentered view focuses on computer input output modes [3] From a system centered view, a single input device could be analyzed to derive multiple interpretations or multiple input devices can combine to help accomplish a single task. This notion of fusion can exist in one of several ....
Schomaker, L., Nijstmans, J., Camurri, A., et al., A Taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System, Esprit Basic Research Action 8579 Miami (1995).
....interaction (MMI) systems lies in the capacity to obtain basic models of the interactive process. Some authors proclaim that a good way to perform it is by following the capabilities already present in the Human Information Processing System (HIPS) being highly optimized in that respect [12]. Just as in the HIPS, if we assume four levels of observation: physical (device characteristics) information theoretical (digital bandwidth and digital communication concepts) cognitive, and intentional, the MMI is related to the cognitive one. That is the level where representational and ....
Schomaker L. et al.: "A Taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System ", A Report of the ESPRIT PROJECT 8579 MIAMI, WP1, 1995.
....human human and human computer interaction that helps to clarify the different termse the definitions. Then, we introduce the definitions that are used in this chapter. There has been discussion in the field on the meaning of and distinction between multimodal and multimedia applications (e.g. [89, 15, 335, 119]) and on related terminology. Several expressions are used: types of information, channel, media, modality, communication means, communication code, mode, multimedia, multimode, multimodal. These expressions are sometime qualified with sensory (i.e. sensory channel) or intelligent (i.e. ....
....as concerning interaction from the computer to the user. 3 Computer Output Media Human Input Channels Computer Human Input Modalities Human output channels Human Computer Interface Automatic Recognition Cognition Computer Figure 1: Model of Human Computer Interaction (from [335]) How are some of the basic terms used in the field There are several human senses (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste, and balance) 346, 256] and psychologists use the term modality explicitly in the context of sensory modalities. Some researchers use the term media for physical devices and ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
L. Schomaker, J. Nijtmans, A. Camurri, F. Lavagetto, P. Morasso, C. Benoit, T. Guiard-Marigny, B. LeGoff, J. Robert-Ribes, A. Adjoudani, I. Def'ee, S. Munch, K. Hartung, and J. Blauert. A taxonomy of multimodal interaction in the human information processing system. Technical report, Esprit Project 8579 MIAMI, February 1995.
....of human human and human computer interaction that helps to clarify the different termse the definitions. Then, we introduce the definitions that are used in this chapter. There has been discussion in the field on he meaning of and distinction between multimodal and multimedia applications (e.g. [74, 11, 281, 100]) and on related terminology. Several expressions are used: types of information, channel, media, modality, communication means, communication code, mode, multimedia, multimode, multimodal. These expressions are sometime qualified with sensory (i.e. sensory channel) or intelligent (i.e. ....
.... (i.e. sensory channel) or intelligent (i.e. intelligent multimedia system) Automatic Recognition Cognition Computer Input Modalities Computer Output Media Human Output Channels Human Input Channels Human Computer Interface Computer Human Figure 1: Model of Human Computer Interaction (from [281]) Beyond these argued terminologies, the same set of general concepts is established in the field: ffl The user communicates (or tries to) with the computer using several input physical devices (keyboard, mouse, microphone, and so on) ffl In order to achieve this communication, several motor ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
L. Schomaker, J. Nijtmans, A. Camurri, F. Lavagetto, P. Morasso, C. Benoit, T. Guiard-Marigny, B. LeGoff, J. Robert-Ribes, A. Adjoudani, I. Def'ee, S. Munch, K. Hartung, and J. Blauert. A taxonomy of multimodal interaction in the human information processing system. Technical report, Esprit Project 8579 MIAMI, February 1995.
No context found.
Schomaker l., Nijtmans J., Camurri A., Lavagetto F., Morasso P., Benoit C., Guiard-Marigny A., Le Goff B., RobertRibes J., Adjoudani A., Defee I., Munch S., Hartung K. and Blauert J., 1997 `A Taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System', Report of the ESPRIT PROJECT 8579 MIAMI, February.
No context found.
L. Schomaker, S. Mnch, K. Hartung (Ed.): "A Taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System", A Report of the ESPRIT Project 8579 MIAMI, Feb. 1995.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC