| David Metz and Ben Lee. Analyzing the benefits of a separate processor to handle messages for fine-grain multithreading. Technical Report TRECE95.03, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oregon State University, 1995. Submitted to the Seventh IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing. |
....accessible from both threads and inlets, interrupts are disabled during control operations in thread bodies. Other Active Messages implementations avoid this problem by polling for messages at permissible points, rather than taking interrupts [SGS 93] or through new atomic operations [ML95] In Section 2.4, we discuss the effects of different policies toward message reception. 2.2 Message Driven Implementation The Message Driven (MD) implementation uses the message queues as task queues instead of servicing messages immediately. Inlets contain branches directly to threads, ....
David Metz and Ben Lee. Analyzing the benefits of a separate processor to handle messages for fine-grain multithreading. Technical Report TRECE95.03, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oregon State University, 1995. Submitted to the Seventh IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing.
....suggest that we should pay special attention to the I structure accesses, which tend to decide the total number of messages. It is also desirable to share LCV between DP and SP for D CFG to reduce the frame scheduling overheads. But this would require complex hardwares due to the atomicity problem [9]. ....
D. Metz and B. Lee. Analyzing the Benefits of a Separate Processor to Handle Messages for Fine-grain Multithreading. In Proc. 7th IEEE Symp. on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1995.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC