| Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999. IEEE. |
....axioms. Using XML Equivalent Transformation (XET) 3] a declarative programming language for XDD the approach is readily equipped with reasoning capabilities, computational and query processing mechanisms. In order to provide communication means among IWSs, it employs SOAP [5] to encode ACL [14] messages, which could be either messages in KQML [11] or FIPA ACL [10] Section 2 introduces XDD and XET languages, Section 3 identifies basic requirements of IWSs, Section 4 develops an XDD approach to modeling IWSs, Section 5 presents an IWS system architecture, Section 6 demonstrates a ....
....language should allow transportation of ontologies and data, encoded in XML syntax, over Web standard protocols, e.g. HTTP. However, such a language does not yet exist. Since an IWS can be regarded as an autonomous, intelligent software agent offering services on the Web, employment of the ACL [14] as communication medium not only allows various IWSs to represent and exchange data, their intentions, believes and ontologies, but also enables more complex interoperations such as service negotiation by applying existing agent technologies. However, ACL is specifically designed to be ....
Labrou, Y. Finin, T. and Peng, Y. (1999). Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape, IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2), 45--52.
....to [6] This general conception was adopted by the AI agent paradigm that started in the early 1990s with DARPA s development of KQML [9] and has been carried over to FIPA s ACL. Key figures in this latter development have been Cohen Levesque, Sadek, and Singh (e.g. 4] 10] 14] see [8] for a survey. All of these later writers acknowledge their debt to Searle s [13] general account. Austin s [1] initial descriptions of speech acts included such leading examples as saying I hereby pronounce you man and wife or I order you to remain quiet, and thereby making the people ....
Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng. Y.: Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14 (1999) 45-52
....beliefs of the agents participating in a dialogue using the language. For example, the inform locution may only be uttered if the rst agent believes the proposition to be true, which is thus a semantic condition for the locution. Further information regarding FIPA ACL and KQML may be found in [29, 34]; a recent introduction to the subject of autonomous agents and multi agent systems can be found in [67] 3 Types of dialogues An in uential model of human dialogues is the typology of primary dialogue types of argumentation theorists Doug Walton and Erik Krabbe [63] This categorization is ....
....as the basis for agent interaction protocols has only just begun, and there are many challenging issues still open. In this section we consider some of these. 6. 1 Protocol semantics One of the reasons for the popularity of the FIPA ACL is the fact that it has been given a well de ned semantics [29]. This semantics, as we mentioned above, is based on speech act theory and is de ned in terms of the certain beliefs, uncertain beliefs and intentions of the participating agents. Having such a de ned semantics means that participants know precisely what other speakers mean and intend by their ....
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45-52, March/April 1999. 15
....the message needs to be represented in some form of content language. Here KIF (the Knowledge Interchange Format) a2 and FIPA SL (Semantic Language) the content language for FIPA ACL, are the most commonly used languages. More information about agent communication languages can be found in [36] [82], 75] 158] Moreover, there are a number of products and services on the Internet that aim to facilitate the cooperation among trading partners as well as promote the efficiency of the supply chain. These efforts include the Global Commerce Initiative (which aims to promote a global supply ....
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45 52, March-April 1999.
.... agent communication infrastructure) in order to enable handheld devices embedded agents to exchange information and knowledge with other embedded agents or with agents located in desktop computers (PCs and Workstations) This tool works with an agent communication protocol called KQML [12] 13] 14][15] and with a content optionally written in XML. KSACI is already fully implemented and its preliminary test results, on cell phone emulators, are encouraging. The next section enumerates some problems and requirements for the development of J2ME based applications. Then, the KSACI architecture and ....
....since objects are very important in certain applications. The Outer Language chosen for our architecture was KQML because it was the ACL used by SACI and by several of MAS nowadays. KQML is a language and a protocol specification to support high level communication among agents [12] 13] 14][15]. And as an Agent Communication Language (ACL) KQML enables agents to exchange information and knowledge. As known, KQML does not specify the content of its messages. As SACI uses Java as its language, the content language of the KQML messages can be either java Strings or serialized java ....
Yannis Labrou, Tim Finin, and Yun Peng. "Agent communication languages: the current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems", 14(2):45--52, March/April 1999.
.... agent communication infrastructure) in order to enable handheld devices embedded agents to exchange information and knowledge with other embedded agents or with agents located in desktop computers (PCs and Workstations) This tool works with an agent communication protocol called KQML [12][13][14] 15] and with a content optionally written in XML. KSACI is already fully implemented and its preliminary test results, on cell phone emulators, are encouraging. The next section enumerates some problems and requirements for the development of J2ME based applications. Then, the KSACI ....
....KQML Message, since objects are very important in certain applications. The Outer Language chosen for our architecture was KQML because it was the ACL used by SACI and by several of MAS nowadays. KQML is a language and a protocol specification to support high level communication among agents [12][13][14] 15] And as an Agent Communication Language (ACL) KQML enables agents to exchange information and knowledge. As known, KQML does not specify the content of its messages. As SACI uses Java as its language, the content language of the KQML messages can be either java Strings or serialized ....
Yannis Labrou and Tim Finin, "Agent Communication Language: the current landscape", IEEE Intelligent systems, March/April, 1999.
....HRCL message Fig. 2 Spoken language interface Internally, of course, the exchanged messages are represented more formally. The multi agent systems community has been developing languages for communication between agents. Probably the best known is ACL, acronym of Agent Communication Language [15]. ACL is composed of three parts: an ontology for a given domain; an inner language, for knowledge representation; and an outer language and protocol for information and knowledge exchange. The outer language is KQML, or Knowledge Query and Manipulation Language. It offers a variety of message ....
Labrou, Y., T. Finn and Y. Peng (1999) "Agent Communication Languages: the Current Landscape", IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14 (2), 45-52.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999. IEEE.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999. IEEE.
No context found.
Labrou. Y, T. Finin and Peng, Y. (1999) "Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape", Intelligent Systems, 14(2).
No context found.
Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(2) (1999) 45--52
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999.
No context found.
Labrou Y., Finin T., Peng Y., Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape, Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, March/April 1999, IEEE Computer Society.
No context found.
Labrou, Y., Finin, T., Peng, Y.: Agent communication languages: the current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14 (1999) 45--52
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. Intelligent Systems, 14, 1999.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent Communication Languages: the Current Landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, March-April 1999.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng, Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 45-52, 1999.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999.
No context found.
Labrou. Y, T. Finin and Peng, Y. (1999) "Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape", IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2): 45-52.
No context found.
Labrou, Y, Finin, T, and Peng, Y. 1999. Agent communication languages: the current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2): 45-52.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current land-scape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2), 1999.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. Intelligent Systems, 14, 1999.
No context found.
Y. Labrou, T. Finin, and Y. Peng. Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2):45--52, 1999.
No context found.
Labrou Y., Finin T., Peng Y., (1999), "Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape", IEEE Internet Computing, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 45 -- 52. 35
No context found.
Labrou, Y.; Finin, T.: Agent Communication Languages: The Current Landscape, Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, IEEE Computer Society (1999)
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC