| G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995. |
....approach is to use redundancy to harden services against bugs. A traditional Byzantine fault tolerant (BFT) system runs different implementations of the same service on several replicas and ensures that correct computation is performed by enough correct replicas to mask incorrect replicas [1, 2, 4, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Recent research has shown that BFT systems can be practical for several important services as they can be implemented with low overheads compared to the unreplicated services [3] However, although traditional BFT systems improve availability and integrity through redundancy, existing BFT ....
....15] in which a group of service replicas use intersection properties of quorum sets to guarantee that clients retrieve values of variables written previously. Byzantine fault tolerance for arbitrary services captured by state machines have been studied in both theoretical and practical settings. [2, 3, 4, 16, 17] In particular, Castro and Liskov [3, 4, 16] have shown that BFT systems can be practical because i) The throughput and latency of several BFT services implemented by them are comparable to unreplicated service [3] and ii) Multiple implementations of the same legacy services by different vendors ....
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995. 4
....that p has found to be acceptable ; p decides v if it receives sufficiently many acknowledgments from others that they have changed their value to v, so that a value different from v will never be found acceptable at a later time. Similar methods have already appeared in the literature (e.g. see [2], 19] Reischuk [17] and Pinter [16] have also obtained consensus results that treat message and processor faults separately. 1.3 PARTIALLY SYNCHRONOUS COMMUNICATION AND PROCESSORS. It is easy to extend the models described in Section 1.2 to allow processors, as well as communication, to be ....
BRACHA, G., AND TOUEG, S. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. ACM 32, 4 (Oct. 1985), 824-840. 323
....has one sender process and several recipient processes. In the rest of the section, we will make the classical separation of receiving a message from the network and delivering a message the result of the protocol execution. A reliable multicast protocol enforces the following two properties [6]: 1) all correct processes deliver the same messages; 2) if a correct sender transmits a message then all correct processes deliver this message. These rules do not imply any guarantees of delivery in case of a malicious sender. However, one of two things will happen, either the correct ....
Bracha, G., Toueg, S.: Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32 (1985) 824--840
....has one sender process and several recipient processes. In the rest of the section, we will make the classical separation of receiving a message from the network and delivering a message the result of the protocol execution. A reliable multicast protocol enforces the following two properties [6]: 1) all correct processes deliver the same messages; 2) if a correct sender transmits a message then all correct processes deliver this message. These rules do not imply any guarantees of delivery in case of a malicious sender. However, one of two things will happen, either the correct ....
....of the agreement later, when it receives the first message from the protocol. Then, it multicasts the message. Bracha and Toueg have shown that, assuming arbitrary faults, it is impossible to send reliable multicasts if there are more than f n 1 faulty processes in a 3 system with n processes [6]. BRM imposes constraints on the number of process failures that are similar to accidental fault tolerant protocols: for f faults, BRM requires n f 2 processes, instead of n 3f 1. In reality, BRM does not impose a minimum number of correct processes, but we say that the number of ....
Bracha, G., Toueg, S.: Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32 (1985) 824-840
....than b replicas corroborate each update must be employed. Prior studies of update diffusion in distributed systems that can suffer Byzantine failures have focused on singlesource broadcast protocols that provide reliable communication to replicas and replica agreement on the broadcast value (e.g. [LSP82, DS83, BT85, MR97]) sometimes with additional ordering guarantees on the delivery of updates from different sources (e.g. Rei94, CASD95, MM95] and [KMM98, CL99] The problem that we consider here is different from these works in the following ways. First, in these prior works, it is assumed that one replica ....
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
....process, in BAM, must deliver its messages in a same order. In the rest of the document, we will make the classical separation of receiving a message from the network and delivering a message the result of the protocol execution. Informally, a reliable multicast protocol enforces the following [7]: 1) all correct processes deliver the same messages, and 2) if a correct sender transmits a message then all correct processes deliver this message. For atomic multicast, total order must be added in the first assertive. These rules do not imply any guarantees of delivery in case of a malicious ....
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
....settings where the system exhibits benign failures only. Prior studies of update di usion in distributed systems that can su er Byzantine failures have focused on single source broadcast protocols that provide reliable communication to replicas and replica agreement on the broadcast value (e.g. [LSP82,DS83,BT85,MR97]) sometimes with additional ordering guarantees on the delivery of updates from di erent sources (e.g. Rei94,CASD95,MM95,KMM98,CL99] The problem that we consider here is di erent from these works in the following ways. First, in these prior works, it is assumed that one replica begins with ....
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824-840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840. ACM, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840. ACM, October 1985.
No context found.
Gabriel Bracha and Sam Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg, \Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols," Journal of the ACM, vol. 32, pp. 824-840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
Gabriel Bracha and Sam Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985. 22
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg, "Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols," Journal of the ACM, vol. 32, pp. 824--840, Oct. 1985. 85
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824-- 840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous Consensus and Broadcast Protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824-840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. In Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, October 1995.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985. 22
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824-840, October 1985.
No context found.
Gabriel Bracha and Sam Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
Bracha, G. and Toueg, S. (1985) Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. ACM, 32, 824--840.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824-840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. ACM, 32(4):824--840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. J. of the ACM, 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM 32(4):824--840, October 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg, \Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols," Journal of the ACM, vol. 32, pp. 824-840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
G. Bracha and S. Toueg, "Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols," Journal of the ACM, vol. 32, pp. 824--840, Oct. 1985.
No context found.
Gabriel Bracha and Sam Toueg. Asynchronous consensus and broadcast protocols. Journal of the ACM, 32(4), pages 824--840, October 1985.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC