A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proc. of USENIX Technical Conference, pages 1--14, Jan. 1996. 12  Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
First 50 documents Next 50
Metadata Efficiency in Versioning File Systems - Soules, Goodson, Strunk, Ganger (2003) (9 citations) (Correct)
....[1, 7, 12, 18] by many different groups. Much of the work done to improve both LFS and LFS cleaners is directly applicable to CVFS. While journal based metadata is a new concept, journal14 ing has been used in several different file systems to provide metadata consistency guarantees efficiently [8, 9, 11, 39, 42]. Similarly to journal based metadata, LFS s segment summary block contains all of the metadata for the data in a segment, but is stored in an uncompressed format. Zebra s deltas improved upon this by storing only the changes to the metadata, but were designed exclusively for roll forward (a ....
A. Sweeney. Scalability in the XFS file system. USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 1--14, 1996.
Conquest: Better Performance through a.. - Wang, Reiher, Popek, .. (2002) (1 citation) (Correct)
....Large files are stored on disk in 4 KB blocks, so that we can use the existing paging and protection code without alterations. An optimization is to enlarge the block size to 64 KB or 256 KB for better performance. 5 Conquest Performance We compared Conquest with ext2 [5] reiserfs [26] SGI XFS [40], and ramfs by Transmeta. We chose ext2, reiserfs, and SGI XFS largely because they are the common basis for various performance comparisons. Note that with 2 Gbytes of physical RAM, these diskbased file systems use caching extensively, and our performance numbers reflect how well these file ....
Sweeney A, Doucette D, Hu W, Anderson C, Nishimoto M, Peck G. Scalability in the XFS File System. Proceedings of the USENIX 1996.
Performance Analysis and Optimization of the Hurricane File System.. - Tam (2003) (Correct)
....sfs [38] Galley File System [48] IBM Vesta PIOFS File System [17] IBM GPFS [67] Intel PFS [79] Intel CFS [10] and PVFS [13] Local le systems designed for shared memory multiprocessors share data structures at a very ne level of granularity. Examples of such le systems include SGI XFS [75], IBM JFS [9] Sun UFS [45] HP HFS [11] Linux Ext2 [58] and Microsoft NTFS [63, 64] The Hurricane File System also falls under this category. Orthogonally, le systems can also be classi ed as journaling, meaning they use a transaction log to prevent le system corruption and enable quick le ....
....File System also falls under this category. Orthogonally, le systems can also be classi ed as journaling, meaning they use a transaction log to prevent le system corruption and enable quick le system recovery in the event of a system crash. Journaling le systems include IBM JFS [8] SGI XFS [75], Sun UFS [43] ReiserFS [42] and Linux Ext3 [80, 29] 2.5 Related Work Three areas of related work are le system design, le system workload studies, and le system benchmarking. Previous le system designs o er useful advice in achieving performance scalability. File system workload studies ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
Adam Sweeney, Doug Doucette, Wei Hu, Curtis Anderson, Mike Nishimoto, and Geo Peck. Scalability in the XFS File System. In USENIX, San Diego, California, January 1996. USENIX Association.
Metadata Efficiency in a Comprehensive Versioning File.. - Soules, Goodson, Strunk, .. (2002) (4 citations) (Correct)
....used [1, 7, 12, 17] by many different groups. Much of the work done to improve both LFS and LFS cleaners is directly applicable to CVFS. While journal based metadata is a new concept, journaling has been used in several different file systems to provide metadata consistency guarantees efficiently [8, 9, 11, 39, 42]. Database systems also use the roll back and roll forward concepts to ensure consistency during transactions [13] Several systems have used copy on write and differencing techniques that are common to versioning systems to decrease the bandwidth required during system backup or distributed ....
Adam Sweeney. Scalability in the XFS file system. USENIX. (San Diego, CA, 22--26 January 1996.
FARSITE: Federated, Available, and Reliable.. - Adya, Bolosky.. (2002) (13 citations) (Correct)
....and subsequently signing certificates for new machines and users, no effort is required from a central administrator. There are many directions we could have explored in the Farsite design space that we have chosen not to. Farsite is not a high speed parallel I O system such as SGI s XFS [43], and it does not efficiently support large scale write sharing of files. Farsite is intended to emulate the behavior of a traditional local file system, in particular NTFS [42] therefore, it introduces no new user visible semantics, such as an object model interface, transactional support, ....
A. Sweeny, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, G. Peck, "Scalability in the XFS File System", USENIX, 1996.
Recent Filesystem Optimisations in FreeBSD - Dowse, Malone (2002) (9 citations) (Correct)
....operations, such as populating a directory with files, can become quadratic in the size of the directory. The design of filesystems since FFS has often taken account of the possibility of large directories, by using BTrees or similar structures for the on disk directory images (e.g. XFS [16], JFS [1] and ReiserFS [13] Dirhash retrofits a directory indexing system to FFS. To avoid repeated linear searches of large directories, dirhash builds a hash table of directory entries on the fly. This can save significant amounts of CPU time for subsequent lookups. In contrast to filesystems ....
....when delete operations take place, instead of waiting for the next create operation. This has not yet been implemented. 3.6 Comparisons with Other Schemes The most common directory indexing technique deployed today is probably the use of on disk tree structures. This technique is used in XFS [16] and JFS [1] to support large directories; it is used to store all data in ReiserFS [13] In these schemes, the index is maintained on disk and so they avoid the cost of building the index on first access. The primary downsides to these schemes are code complexity and the need to accommodate the ....
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, C. Anderson W. Hu, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system, January 1996, http://www. usenix.org/publications/library/ proceedings/sd96/sweeney.html.
Bridging the Information Gap in Storage Protocol Stacks - Denehy, Arpaci-Dusseau.. (2002) (9 citations) (Correct)
.... improving both performance [23] and functionality [33] In file systems, many approaches have been developed to improve performance, including read optimized inode and file placement [23] logging of writes [30] improved meta data update methods [39] more scalable internal data structures [41], and off line reorganization strategies [22] However, almost all such techniques have been developed under the assumption that the file system will be run upon a single, traditional disk. More recently, storage systems have also received much attention. For example, smart disks can improve ....
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS File System. In Proceedings of the USENIX 1996.
GPFS: A Shared-Disk File System for Large Computing Clusters - Schmuck, Haskin (2002) (30 citations) (Correct)
....write sharing, or sacrifice POSIX semantics to do so. For example, SANergy allows multiple clients to read and write to the same file through a SAN, but provides no consistent view of the data unless explicit fcntl locking calls are added to the application program. SGI s XFS file system [16] is designed for similar, large scale, high throughput applications that GPFS excels at. It stores file data in large, variable length extents and relies on an underlying logical volume manager to stripe the data across multiple disks. Unlike GPFS however, XFS is not a cluster file system; it runs ....
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS File System, Proceedings of the USENIX 1996.
Track-aligned Extents: Matching Access Patterns to.. - Schindler, Griffin, .. (2002) (9 citations) (Correct)
.... grow on the disk, which is rare after the first 48 hours of operation [30] 3.2 Allocation and access To utilize track boundary information, the algorithms for on disk placement and request generation must support variable sized extents. Extent based file systems, such as NTFS [28] and XFS [43], allocate disk space to files by specifying ranges of LBNs (extents) associated with each file. Such systems lend themselves naturally to trackbased alignment of data: during allocation, extent ranges can be chosen to fit track boundaries. Block based file systems, such as Ext2 [4] and FFS [25] ....
Adam Sweeney. Scalability in the XFS file system. USENIX. (San Diego, California), pages 1 14, 22 26 January 1996.
Virtual Log Based File Systems for a Programmable Disk - Wang, Anderson, Patterson (1999) (30 citations) Self-citation (Anderson) (Correct)
No context found.
Sweeney, A., Doucette, D., Hu, W., Anderson, C., Nishimoto, M., and Peck, G. Scalability in the XFS File System. In Proc. of the 1996.
Characteristics of File System Workloads - Drew Roselli And (1998) (9 citations) Self-citation (Anderson) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck, "Scalability in the XFS File System," Proceedings of the USENIX 1996.
Efficiently Binding Data to Owners in - Distributed Content-Addressable.. (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proc. of USENIX Technical Conference, pages 1--14, Jan. 1996. 12
Two Level, Self-Verifying Data for Peer-to-Peer Storage - Eaton, Weatherspoon.. (2005) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proc. of USENIX Technical Conference, pages 1--14, Jan. 1996.
Storage Systems Support for Multimedia Applications - Halvorsen, Griwodz, al. (2003) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
Adam Sweeney, Doug Doucette, Wei Hu, Curtis Anderson, Mike Nishimoto, and Geoff Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proceedings of the USENIX Technical Conference, pages 1--14, San Diego, CA, USA, 1996.
USENIX Association - Usenix (2004) (2 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
Adam Sweeney, et al. Scalability in the XFS File System. USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pp. 1-14, January 1996.
OBFS: A File System for Object-based Storage Devices - Feng Wang Scott (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proceedings of the 1996.
Dynamic Metadata Management for Petabyte-scale File Systems - Weil, Pollack, Brandt.. (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proceedings of the 1996.
The Effects of Memory-Rich Environments on File System .. - Wang, Kuenning.. (Correct)
No context found.
Sweeney A, Doucette D, Hu W, Anderson C, Nishimoto M, Peck G. Scalability in the XFS File System. Proceedings of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, January 1996.
File System Support for Delta Compression - Joshua Macdonald University (2000) (25 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
SWEENEY, A., DOUCETTE, D., HU,W.,ANDERSON, C., NISHIMOTO, M., AND PECK, G. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Usenix Annual Technical Conference (Berkeley, CA, USA, Jan.
Performance Analysis and Optimization of the Hurricane File System.. - Tam (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Adam Sweeney, Doug Doucette, Wei Hu, Curtis Anderson, Mike Nishimoto, and Geo# Peck. Scalability in the XFS File System. In USENIX, San Diego, California, January 1996. USENIX Association.
OBFS: A File System for Object-based Storage Devices - Feng Wang Scott (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proceedings of the 1996.
OBFS: A File System for Object-based Storage Devices - Feng Wang Scott (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proceedings of the 1996.
DualFS: a New Journaling File System without Meta-Data.. - Piernas, Cortes, Garcia (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS file system. In Proc. of the USENIX 1996.
The Implementation of the File Service Module for the Distributed.. - Tatah (2001) (Correct)
No context found.
Adam Sweeney, Doug Doucette, and Wei Hu. Scalability in the xfs file system. http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/papers/xfsusenix /index.html, 1999.
Increasing Predictive Accuracy through Limited Prefetching - Tsozen Yeh Darrell (2002) (Correct)
No context found.
A. Sweeney, D. Doucette, W. Hu, C. Anderson, M. Nishimoto, and G. Peck. Scalability in the XFS File System. In Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 33--44, 1996.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC