Martin S. Lacher, Jorg Nonnenmacher, and Ernst W. Biersack, "Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 224, April 2000. Home/Search Document Details and Download
Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Layered Multicast Recovery - Rhee, Joshi, Lee, Muthukrishnan.. (1999) (6 citations) (Correct)
....called blocks. For each block, h FEC encoded packets are generated for suitably chosen h. Receivers can recover the original block by receiving any B packets out of the B h ones. When combined with an appropriate ARQ technique, the FEC technique incurs very low network overhead [14] 15] [12], 21] 20] 11] The FEC approach can be employed in any of the protocols we have described so far such as SRM, tree based protocols etc. A noteworthy example is the SHARQFEC protocol [11] that combines hierarchical scoping and hybrid FEC ARQ. It breaks the entire multicast group into ....
M. Lacher, J. Nonnenmacher, and E. Biersack. Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast. In Submitted to Transactions on Networking, August 1998.
Layered Multicast Recovery - Rhee, Joshi, Lee, Muthukrishnan.. (1999) (6 citations) (Correct)
....of B packets, called blocks. For each block, h FEC encoded packets are generated for suitably chosen h. Receivers can recover the original block by receiving any B packets out of the B h ones. When combined with an appropriate ARQ technique, the FEC technique incurs very low network overhead [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 3]. The FEC approach can be employed in any of the protocols we have described so far such as SRM, tree based protocols etc. A noteworthy example is the SHARQFEC protocol [3] that combines hierarchical scoping and hybrid FEC ARQ. It breaks the entire multicast group into hierarchically nested scopes ....
....reliable multicast. They also compared a layered implementation of the technique where FEC and ARQ are supported at different system layers with non layered, combined implementation, and analytically showed that the combined approach yields more efficiency in the use of bandwidth. Recent studies [12, 13] also show that a hybrid technique can yield high performance when combined with local distributed recovery as in tree based protocols. However, they report that FEC based recovery diminishes the performance advantage of local recovery over sender oriented recovery. Their work analytically shows ....
J. Nonnenmacher M. Lacher and E. Biersack. Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast. In Submitted to Transactions on Networking, August 1998.
Scalable Reliable Multicast with Layered Recovery.. - Rhee, Joshi, Lee, .. (Correct)
....of B packets, called blocks. For each block, h FEC encoded packets are generated for suitably chosen h. Receivers can recover the original block by receiving any B packets out of the B h ones. When combined with an appropriate ARQ technique, the FEC technique incurs very low network overhead [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 3]. The FEC approach can be employed in any of the protocols we have described so far such as SRM, tree based protocols etc. A noteworthy example is the SHARQFEC protocol [3] that combines hierarchical scoping and hybrid FEC ARQ. It breaks the entire multicast group into hierarchically nested scopes ....
....reliable multicast. They also compared a layered implementation of the technique where FEC and ARQ are supported at different system layers with non layered, combined implementation, and analytically showed that the combined approach yields more efficiency in the use of bandwidth. Recent studies [12, 13] also show that a hybrid technique can yield high performance when combined with local distributed recovery as in tree based protocols. However, they report that FEC based recovery diminishes the performance advantage of local recovery over sender oriented recovery. Their work analytically shows ....
J. Nonnenmacher M. Lacher and E. Biersack. Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast. In Submitted to Transactions on Networking, August 1998.
Stefan Elf, Peter Parnes - Research Report Research (Correct)
No context found.
Martin S. Lacher, Jorg Nonnenmacher, and Ernst W. Biersack, "Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 224, April 2000.
Lateral Error Recovery for Application-Level Multicast - Wong, Chan, Wong, al. (2004) (Correct)
No context found.
Martin S. Lacher, J org Nonnenmacher, and Ernst W. Biersack, "Performance comparison of centralized versus distributed error recovery for reliable multicast," IEEE/ACM Transcations on Networking, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 224--238, April 2000.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC