C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", Internet RFC 1190, October 1990.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....by allowing a fxed set of accesses, preventing certain types of interactions, limiting the type of content that is routed to them or even restricting accesses to a fixed number of clients is not the solution. Although multicasting and bandwidth reservation protocols such as RSVP [1] and ST II [2] can help in better utilizing the network they require support at the router level, more conceited effort is need at higher levels. There needs to be a conceited effort to ensure the efficient utilization of networks and networked resources. The onus of providing an efficient service that takes ....

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", Internet RFC 1190, October 1990.

....is advance reservation where a reservation request specifies the user s intent to use a certain amount of reserved resources, at sometime in future. New features have to be introduced in the architecture to support reservations. These include signaling mechanisms to specify requirements [1] [2], specialized flow handling [3] 4] admission control and QoS routing [5] 6] The immediate reservation models like Integrated Services [7] 8] Stream Protocol [2] and Core Stateless approaches [9] 10] require changing all the routers in the Internet to support QoS. The integrated services ....

....to be introduced in the architecture to support reservations. These include signaling mechanisms to specify requirements [1] 2] specialized flow handling [3] 4] admission control and QoS routing [5] 6] The immediate reservation models like Integrated Services [7] 8] Stream Protocol [2] and Core Stateless approaches [9] 10] require changing all the routers in the Internet to support QoS. The integrated services and stream protocol models require all the routers to maintain reservation states. The core stateless model frees the core routers from the burden of state maintenance ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)," RFC 1190, IETF, October 1990.

....to the Internet architecture to give it support for quality of service. While the proposed approaches differ significantly in detail, one characteristic they universally share is their requirement that every router within a network be modified in order to support QoS. In the stream protocol [1] and integrated services [2] 3] approaches, all routers must maintain per flow state and participate in a signaling protocol. In the core stateless approaches, the most notable of which are differentiated services [4] and dynamic packet state [5] 6] per flow state is maintained only at ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)," RFC 1190, IETF, October 1990.

....is advance reservation where a reservation request specifies the user s intent to use a certain amount of reserved resources, at sometime in future. New features have to be introduced in the architecture to support reservations. These include signaling mechanisms to specify requirements [1] [2], specialized flow handling [3] 4] admission control and QoS routing [5] 6] The immediate reservation models like Integrated Services [7] 8] Stream Protocol [2] and Core Stateless guarantees [9] 10] 2 require changing all the routers in the Internet to support QoS. The integrated ....

....to be introduced in the architecture to support reservations. These include signaling mechanisms to specify requirements [1] 2] specialized flow handling [3] 4] admission control and QoS routing [5] 6] The immediate reservation models like Integrated Services [7] 8] Stream Protocol [2] and Core Stateless guarantees [9] 10] 2 require changing all the routers in the Internet to support QoS. The integrated services models mandate all the routers to maintain reservation states. The core stateless model frees the core routers from the burden of state maintenance but requires the ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)," RFC 1190, IETF, October 1990.

....sessions (either multicast or unicast) to communicate with each other in order to set up the necessary router state to support the services described previously. It is worth noting that RSVP is not the only IP reservation protocol that has been designed for this purpose. Others include ST II [13] and ST II [14] which incidently contain some interesting architectural differences from RSVP, such as the use of hard state and sender initiated 6 reservations rather than soft state 7 and receiver initiated reservations, as in RSVP. However, for the rest of this tutorial the only ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)," RFC1190, Oct. 1990, ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1190. txt.

....unified protocol stack model, employing a single internet layer protocol for both real time and non real time service. Thus, we propose to use the existing internet layer protocol (e.g. IP or CLNP) for real time data. Another approach would be to add a new real time protocol in the internet layer [ST2 90]. Our unified stack approach provides economy of mechanism, and it allows us to fold controlled link sharing in easily. It also handles the problem of partial coverage, i.e. allowing interoperation between IS capable Internet systems and systems that have not been extended, without the ....

....node, a local reconciliation must be performed between the offered and the requested flowspec to create a reservation, and an appropriately modified requested flowspec is passed on. This two pass scheme allows extensive properties like allowed delay to be distributed across hops in the path [Tenet90, ST2 90]. Further work is needed to define the amount of generality, with a corresponding level of complexity, that is required in the reservation model. Braden, Clark Shenker [Page 19] RFC1633 RFC.net Page 20 of 34 RFC 1633 Integrated Services Architecture June 1994 4. Traffic Control Mechanisms We ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, BBN, October 1990.

....to the Internet architecture to give it support for quality of service. While the proposed approaches differ significantly in detail, one characteristic they universally share is their requirement that every router within a network be modified in order to support QoS. In the stream protocol [1] and integrated services [2] 3] approaches, all routers must maintain per flow state and participate in a signaling protocol. In the corestateless approaches, the most notable of which are differentiated services [4] and dynamic packet state [5] per flow state is maintained only at routers on ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)," RFC 1190, IETF, October 1990.

....the QOS Ticket model. Currently, the resource control mechanisms for QOSTicket are being added to RT Mach. As shown in the experiment, the processor capacity reservation mechanism can be used for managing the CPU resource. For managing network resources, reservation based protocols such as ST II [18] and RSVP [19] can be used. In our project, an ST II protocol server is being developed on RT Mach [20] For managing disk resources, there are several mechanisms by which disk access bandwidth can be reserved [21, 22] In parallel with this OS level extension, we are developing a new QOS Manager ....

C. Topolcic et al.: "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)," Internet RFC-1190 (1990).

....1 The same address can be allocated to different concurrent applications if restrictions are imposed on the geographical location of the participants (scoping) This is not desirable, however, as many applications become more appealing as the distance between the participants increases. 2 ST II [21] provides the option of using IP multicast addresses (in which case an outside mechanism for multicast address management is needed) but most implementations use lists of unicast addresses. 3 The SD program has been developed by V. Jacobson, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories) increases the ....

C. Topolcic. Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II). RFC1190, October 1990.

....GSEs. CC controls and manages the TCs(Transport Connections) in the user plane. TC provides communication services for each ASE. There is one to one correspondence relation between ASE and TC. TC consists of basic transport objects such as ATM bearer connection[3] TCP IP connection, ST II stream[11] according to TC type . MMCP provide communication services to each ASE by means of TC. A set of TC GTC TC TC TC TC TC GTC GTC R R user user user TC : Transport Connection GTC : Grouped TC R : Relation Communication Platform call Figure 2. Structure of the HEART Call Model TCs can be ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol (Version 2)," RFC 1190, NIC, SRI International, Oct., 1990.

....for IPv4, we must be pessimistic and include in the new Network Layer the specific resources management mechanisms that can support the enhanced QoS desired by the NS users. The separate work on the enhancement of the Network Service of different teams of researchers (TENET [Fer 92] ST II [Top 90] RSVP [ZDESZ 93] INTSERV [SCZ 93] has finally resulted in the same kind of resources management architecture, that is, all four proposals share the same decomposition of functionality in three basic modules (resource reservation protocol, access control module, packet forwarding path) while ....

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, 10/1992

....the target value introduced by the calling user, the only possible modification introduced by the negotiation is the weakening of the target but limited by the lowest quality acceptable value. The class 2 of the ISO Network Service [ISO 8348] is based on this scheme which is also used in ST II [Top 90] and [FRV 93] 2.3 TRIANGULAR NEGOTIATION FOR A CONTRACTUAL VALUE In this type of negotiation, the goal is to obtain a contractual value of a QoS parameter which will bind both the service provider and the service users. Here the calling user introduces, in the request primitive, two values of ....

....SIP. This protocol will be used to set up a route and reserve resources on each node along the route. This was already the philosophy of [AHS 90] and of the Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST II) which is an IP layer protocol that provides end toend guaranteed service across an internet. Top 90] One of the main goals of ST II was to provide a point to point simplex and a point to multipoint simplex data transfer for the applications with real time requirements. In the ST II specification, these simplex data paths are called stream . An ST stream is : the set of paths that data ....

C. Topolcic, Ed., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", Network Working Group RFC 1190, Oct. 1990

....the context lookup costs at packet driver level could be much less than using a generic packet filter. Nevertheless, the use of the multimedia transport system MMT [6] would also provides us with the possibility to perform very fast context lookups, since both the used network layer protocol ST2 [7] and the transport layer protocol XTP Lite provides unique identifiers per connection. 3.2 Packet Reassembling, Packet Buffering We will exclude all packet reassembling functionality from user space data processing. Thus, the collection of per ADU frames must be done prior to its insertion into ....

C. Topolcic: "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2", RFC1190

....to allow carrying several RTP packets in one lowerlayer protocol data unit, such as a UDP packet. Carrying several RTP packets in one network or transport packet reduces header overhead and may simplify synchronization between different streams. 8. 2 ST II When used in conjunction with RTP, ST II [11] service access ports (SAPs) have a length of 16 bits. The next protocol field ( NextPCol , Section 4.2.2.10 in RFC 1190) is used to distinguish two encapsulations of RTP over ST II. The first uses NextPCol value TBD and directly places the RTP packet into the ST II data area. If NextPCol value ....

C. Topolcic, S. Casner, C. Lynn, Jr., P. Park, and K. Schroder, "Experimental internet stream protocol, version 2 (ST-II)," Network Working Group Request for Comments RFC 1190, BBN Systems and Technologies, Oct. 1990. H. Schulzrinne/S. Casner Expires 11/01/93 [Page 34]

No context found.

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", Internet RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

C. Topolcic, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc., October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, version 2 (ST II)", RFC 1190, CIP Working Group, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", Internet RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, CIP Working Group, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., Editor, "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST- II)", RFC 1190, CIP Working Group, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol, Version 2 (ST-II)", RFC 1190, October 1990.

No context found.

Topolcic, C., "Experimental Internet Stream Protocol: Version 2 (ST-II)", Internet RFC 1190, October 1990.

First 50 documents  Next 50

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC