Robert Macfadzean, "Surface-Based Air Defense System Analysis," Boston, Massachusetts: Artech House, 1992. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Reference Architecture Representation Environment (RARE) - A.. - Graser (1996) (Correct)
.... sensors (e.g. radars, infrared detectors, and surveillance monitors) and weapons (e.g. guns and missiles) A naval combat system on a warship is comprised of these sensors and weapons and the personnel which both select and operate the sensors and weapons and make strategic and tactical decisions [42]. As a result of extensive knowledge acquisition and domain modeling 72 for this research, naval combat system components have been defined for the AAW domain [43] Example components include Communication Channel, Track Record Repository, Target Location Repository, Detector, Emitter, and ....
....Results: Derivation of Component Specifications DETECT CONTROL ENGAGE Various paths of execution 1 2 3 4 5 6 Fig. 11. Detect Control Engage paradigm The canonical paradigm describing the air defense process for a naval combat system is the Detect Control Engage (D C E) paradigm [42]. This paradigm divides the warfighting 2 Tools are being developed at the Naval Surface Warfare Center to facilitate the determination of high level requirements to feed the simulation based design process. 76 process into 3 high level categories which interface with each other: Detect: ....
Robert Macfadzean, "Surface-Based Air Defense System Analysis," Boston, Massachusetts: Artech House, 1992.
Towards Flexible Multi-Agent Decision-Making Under Time.. - Noh, Gmytrasiewicz (1999) (2 citations) (Correct)
....threat and the interception probability. The interception probability 2 , P (H ij ) is dependent on the angle a ij between the target j s direction of motion and the battery i s line of sight, the distance d ij between the battery and the target, and the speed of target s j (see, for example, Macfadzean, 1992 ] as follows: P (H ij ) e Gamma a ij d ij s j (2) where is an interceptor specific constant (assumed here to be 0.001) For example, in Figure 4, the combined benefit of Battery1 s shooting at the threat A and Battery2 s shooting at the threat B amounts to 206:8( 100 Theta 0:94 120 ....
R. H. M. Macfadzean. SurfaceBased Air Defense System Analysis. Artech House, 1992.
A Novel Approach to Asynchronous, Decentralized Decision-Making.. - Tony Lee (Correct)
No context found.
Robert H.M. Macfadzean, "Surface-Based Air Defense System Analysis," Artech House, Boston, 1992.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC