Sudweeks F, Rafaeli S. How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration. In: Harrison TM, Stephen TD, eds. Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st University: SUNY Press, 1996:115-136. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Toward a Framework for Computer-Mediated.. - Patel, Kaufman.. (1998) (1 citation) (Correct)
.... of a seamless integration of parts, as if the conceptual object were produced by a single good mind [5] There is a growing body of research that suggests that computer mediated collaboration is a difficult enterprise, fraught with numerous cognitive, cultural, social, and technical challenges [6]. However, there is also evidence to suggest that genuine collaboration at a distance via the media of computers and wide area networks is attainable. 4 How can a collaboratory achieve such a critical level of coherence How do differing institutional goals, priorities, and cultures converge In ....
Sudweeks F, Rafaeli S. How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration. In: Harrison TM, Stephen TD, eds. Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st University: SUNY Press, 1996:115-136.
"It makes sense": Using an Autoassociative Neural.. - Berthold, Sudweeks, .. (1995) Self-citation (Sudweeks) (Correct)
....good an example is of its category. Categories boundaries then become ill de#ned, if it all existing#what does exist are points of reference to which comparisons are made and which are combined in di#erentways depending on the particular context #Newton, 1992; Smith and Medin, 1981; Rosenman and Sudweeks, 1995#. Observed human behaviour displays a clear grading of membership which does not equate with the classical theory of categories. Rosch #1978#, for example, claims that not all of the de#ning features of a category are necessary and that the more typical the example, the better the membership of ....
....typicality in mediated discussions, a pro#le emerges of the features of messages that engage the attention of others, encourage participation, and predict the formation and#or maintenance of interactive communication settings. 2 The Data 2. 1 Preprocessing The data set was created by ProjectH #Sudweeks and Rafaeli, 1995#, a large group of researchers who collaboratively collected a representative sample of computer mediated discussions. More than a hundred people from #fteen countries used computer networks to plan, organise and implement a quantitative study of social and linguistic dynamics in public ....
Sudweeks, F. and Rafaeli, S.: 1995, Howdoyou get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration, in T. M. Harrison and T. D. Stephen #eds#, Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st Century University, SUNY Press, NY #to appear#.
Typicality in Computer Mediated Discussions - An Analysis with.. - Berthold, I (1995) Self-citation (Sudweeks) (Correct)
....or contribute to longer lasting threads. Our findings support the construct of interactivity as a variable of communication settings. We also demonstrate that an ANN is a valuable preprocessor to other analytical methods. 2. The Data 2.1. Preprocessing The data set was created by ProjectH [10], a large group of researchers who collaboratively collected a representative sample of computer mediated discussions. More than a hundred people from fifteen countries used computer networks to plan, organise and implement a quantitative study of social and linguistic dynamics in public ....
Sudweeks, F. and Rafaeli, S.: 1995, How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration, in T. M. Harrison and T. D. Stephen (eds), Computer Networking and Scholarship in the 21st Century University, SUNY Press, NY (to appear).
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC