| R. Smith, M. Lentczner, W. Smith, A. Taivalsaari, and D. Ungar. Prototype-Based Languages: Object Lessons from Class-Free Programming (Panel). In Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 102--112, 1994. |
....among implementation options, a choice which may have to be revisited later. Greater learning time More policy decisions to make and revisit Prototypes and Classes. There are now several fairly mature object oriented languages based on prototypes. For overviews see [Blas94] DMC92] and [SLS94]. These languages differ somewhat in their treatment of semantic issues like privacy, copying, and the role of inheritance. One notable system, Kevo [Tai93a] Tai92] Tai93] does not have delegation or inheritance at all. All these languages have a model in which an object is in a important ....
R. B. Smith, M. Lentczner, W. Smith, A. Taivalsaari, and D. Ungar, Prototype-Based Languages: Object Lessons from Class-Free Programming (Panel), in Proc. OOPSLA '94, pp. 102-112 (October 1994). Also see the panel summary of the same title, in Addendum to the Proceedings of OOPSLA `94, pp. 48-53.
No context found.
R. Smith, M. Lentczner, W. Smith, A. Taivalsaari, and D. Ungar. Prototype-Based Languages: Object Lessons from Class-Free Programming (Panel). In Proc. Ninth Int'l Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 102--112, 1994.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC