| R. Street. Unpublished manuscript. 1979. |
....(which follows from fully faithfulness of I) B(I; I Gamma) B(I; X Delta 9I ) Gamma) MB(W I; 9I ( Gamma) MB(Y I; 9I ( Gamma) MI Delta 9I ) Gamma) Gamma: Thus B(I; 1) B Gamma ME is an equivalence. Since both E and now ME are locally small it follows from [7] (see also [2] that E is small as required. If C and D are total then a functor F : C Gamma D preserves all colimits if and only if it has a right adjoint. If, moreover, F is Kan then preservation of all colimits is equivalent to invertibility of the canonical natural transformation XD 9F ....
....Again, the reader is advised to think of X as a general counterpart of the supremum arrow for a complete ordered set. Now replace D in the immediately preceding discussion by MD; where D is an arbitrary locally small category. According to our definition of total category and again invoking [7] (or [2] MD is total if and only if D is small. But we do have MYD assuming only that D is locally small. If F is both Kan and a left adjoint then a canonical isomorphism as in the right hand diagram is produced by a modification of the calculations which establish that the canonical arrow in ....
R. Street. Unpublished manuscript. 1979.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC