| N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P.O. Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96), pages 345--360, London, UK, April 1996. |
....generated. Figure 6: A snapshot of the communicative agents. Bright spheres are generated by the matrix theory algorithm, dark ones by spring embedding. which is dynamic and flexible. Figure 6 shows, for example, communicating agents as part of a BT business process to provide a customer quote [10, 20, 15]. In the Figure, most agents stick together but there is one in the distance which did not participate in the negotiations. For this particular application, spring embedding turned out to be a very useful technique to visualise the clustering of agents over time. Rather than considering the ....
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and MultiAgents: PAAM'96, London, UK, 1996.
....of work activities and the invocation of appropriate human and or IT resources associated with the various activity steps. In spite of its undeniable popularity, this procedural approach to the management of business processes has its critics. One apt criticism of WfMS has been raised in [14], as follows: Business processes are highly dynamic and unpredictable it is di#cult to give a complete a priori specification of all the activities that need to be performed and how they should be ordered. Any detailed time plans which are produced are often disrupted by unavoidable ....
....such an approach cannot ensure a policy that ranges over multiple, possibly heterogeneous WfMSs; e.g. requiring that the issuing of POs from all buyers teams, each supported by a distinct WfMS of its department, be monitored by a designated auditor. The Autonomy of Agents: Several researchers [23, 17, 14] consider the the autonomy of participating agents to be crucial for conducting work e#ectively. Each of these proposal has its own approach for such agents to collaborate harmoniously towards a common goal. Action Workflow [17] in particular, is conceptualized as a counter theme to the workflow ....
[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In Proc. of First Intn'l Conf. on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and MultiAgent Technology (PAAM96), pages 345--360, 1996.
.... to awarding a subproblem contract to the contractor(s) with the most appropriate bid(s) Although CNP is considered by Smith and Davis as well as many DAI researchers to be a negotiation principle, other researchers believe it is more a standardized coordination method for the following reasons [13]: 1. There must not be a conflict at all between the agents to start the CNP, hence there is no possibility of bargaining between the agents. The manager does not communicate its minimal condition, nor do the bidders have a second choice (no constraint relaxation) 2. A mutual decision is ....
Jennings, N.R., Paratin, P., & Jonson, M., Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proc. of the First International Conference and Exhibition The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and MultiAgent Technology, London, UK, 1996, pp.345- 376.
....areas are related to our work. Workflow scheduling under temporal constraints and resource management have already been mentioned. Other related areas are job shop scheduling [10, 5, 18, 11, 38] planning in Artificial Intelligence (AI) 30, 8, 19, 9, 29, 28] and agent based workflow systems [37, 34, 25, 26, 27, 20]. We discuss the relationship between these works and ours in Section 9. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents a concrete example to illustrate the problem. Section 3 briefly sketches the use of CTR for workflow It should be understood that nobody expects a workflow engineer to ....
....those that do deal with scheduling do not address this problem under resource allocation constraints. Instead, planning techniques are used to schedule dynamically changing workflows. Agent based workflow systems: Using agent technology for workflow systems is another related research area [37, 34, 25, 26, 27, 20]. In agent based workflow systems, execution decisions are based on the communication events that occur when one agent requests services of another. Research on this area has largely concentrated on intelligent agent modeling and communication issues. Only a few [26] briefly mention the issue of ....
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, and P. O'Brien ad M.E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In Int'l Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, pages 345-- 360, London, 1996.
....through the conversational schema specified by the interface. Agentbased solutions for e service platforms substantially follow similar approaches in terms of service virtualisation [13] The differences in terms of interaction model do not bring major changes in the service integration model [7]. Main limitation of such a model is the rigidity in the interconnection and integration between services. Implementing integration logic into the structure of a service increases the complexity of the service. Moreover, the adaptation of the service to new environmental conditions requires the ....
Jennings, N.R. Faratin, P. Johnson, M.J. O'Brien P.O. and Wiegand, M.E. "Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes". In Proc. First Int. Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM-96).
....WebFlow[8] Panta Rhei[6] and TriGSow[13] The second approach is negotiation in a shared computing slyace. Autonomous agents are used in this approach, and workflow data are extracted through communication and negotiation in a shared data space. A typical example of this approach is ADEPT[11] The third approach is mobile coordination agent. Mobile agents search activities over the network, and organize workflow data. DartFlow[3] and Mobile Agent X[4] are examples based on this approach. 3. Natures of Cross organizatinal Work Process Coordination Existing intra organizational ....
N.R. Jennings, P. Farmin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand, ,,Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes", In Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM'96), pp. 345-360, 1996
....paper will be able to be applied to these informal tasks and also to project management systems (e.g. 5] To solve these problems, the authors have introduced a multi agent system. The reason why we introduced agents is that distributed management is necessary.As Jennings, et al. pointed out[14], multiple autonomous organizations are often involved in business processes, and decentralized decision making usually occurs. A multi agent system fits this type of problem. However, most conventional resource management systems have centralized architectures. In the WorkWeb system, an agent is ....
Jennings, N.R., et al.: Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes, in Proceedings PAAAM'96, (London, UK, Apr. 1996), pp. 345--360
....agent uttering the statement should have some kind of basis of authority for the speech act to have any e ect. We distinguish three types of relations between agents: peer relation, power relation and authorization relation. The rst two relations are similar to the ones used in the ADEPT system [21, 14]. The power relation is used to model hierarchical relations between agents. We assume that these relations are xed during the lifecycle of the agents. Within such a relation less negotiation is possible about requests and demands. This reduces the amount of communication and therefore increases ....
N. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. Johnson, P. O'Brien and M. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology, pages 345-360, London, 1996.
....proposals. The model specifies the key structures and processes involved in this endeavour and defines their inter relationships. The model was shaped by practical considerations and insights emanating from the development of a system of negotiating agents for business process management (see [28] for details) In addition, some convergence and experimental results of certain types of negotiation using this model have been reported [43, 18] Also, in [34] a reinforcement learning algorithm has been designed to enable agents to adapt themselves according to the changing environment, ....
Jennigs, N. R., Faratin, P., Johnson, M. J., O'Brien, P., and Wiegand, M. E. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes, vol. 1435. 1996, pp. 345--360.
....0 (spring embedding) or as their absolute value (SVD) In case the triangle inequality is violated, both algorithms repair the violation, spring embedding with less error. 5. 4 Examples Figure 10 shows an example of communicating agents part of a BT business process to provide a customer quote [14,25,20]. In the figure, most agents stick together but there is one in the distance which did not participate in the negotiations. For this particular application, spring embedding turned out to be a very useful technique to visualize the clustering of agents over time. Rather than considering the ....
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents: PAAM'96, London, UK, 1996.
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P.O. Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96), pages 345--360, London, UK, April 1996.
No context found.
Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Johnson, M. J., O'Brien, P., Wiegand, M.E.: Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In: Proceedings of PAAM'96, (1996) 345-360
No context found.
Jennings, N. R., P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M. E. Wiegand. 1996. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents PAAM'96, London, UK, pages 345--360.
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P.O. Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96), pages 345--360, London, UK, April 1996.
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, M. E. Wiegand: "Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes", Proc. First Int. Conf. on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96),pp. 345-360. London, UK.
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, P. O. O'Brien, and M. E. Wiegand. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes. In First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM-96), pages 345--360, April 1996.
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, M. E. Wiegand: "Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes", Proc. First Int. Conf. on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96),pp. 345-360. London, UK.
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, P.Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings of the First International ConferenceonThePractical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96) , 1996.
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, MJ. Johnson, P O'Brien & ME Wiegan, "Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes". Proc. of PAAM96, U.K., 1996, pp. 245-360.
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P.O'Brien & M.E Wiegan, "Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes". Proc. of PAAM96, U.K., 1996, pp. 245-360.
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P. Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P.O. O'Brien and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM-96), 345-360, April 1996
No context found.
N. R. Jennings, P.Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents andMulti- gent Technology (PAAM96) (1996).
No context found.
N.R. Jennings, P.Faratin, M.J. Johnson, P. O'Brien, and M.E. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology (PAAM96), 1996.
No context found.
N. Jennings, P. Faratin, M. Johnson, P. O'Brien and M. Wiegand. Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes. In Proceedings The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-A gent Technology, pages 345-360, The practical application company, London, 1996.
No context found.
Jennings, N., Faratin, P. Johnson, M., O'Brien, P., and Wiegand, M., Using Intelligent Agents to Manage Business Processes, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on the Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-agent technology (PAAM96), 345-360, 1996.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC