| Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification", RFC 1094, Sun Microsystems, Inc., March 1989. NFS version 2 protocol specification. |
....on that machine. This means that Nemesis users are the equivalent of a UNIX user that is able to access all resources, i.e. 83 superuser. Therefore, all Nemesis users are simply given the user id that represents the UNIX superuser. The VFS tree is also extended with a NFS version 2 interface [45, 88] as is shown in Figure 5.3. This interface maps external NFS requests to internal Clockwise POSIX calls to execute the NFS operations on a file system. In the NFS protocol, a UNIX user and group identification are transmitted as part of the NFS request. This user and group identification is used ....
Sun Microsystems Inc. Network File System specification. RFC1094. DDN Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
....requirement, we felt that solving the write throughput bottleneck would provide the most compelling feature. 3.1. Changes introduced NFS Version 3 represents an evolution of the existing NFS Version 2 protocol. Most of the original design features described in [Joy84a] Sandberg85] and [RFC1094] persist. This revision introduces the following major changes: Sizes and offsets are widened from 32 bits to 64 bits. The WRITE and COMMIT procedures allow reliable asynchronous writes. A new ACCESS procedure fixes known problems with super user permission mapping and allows servers to ....
....information to improve cache management. Although implementations have been used to illustrate aspects of the NFS protocol, the specification itself is the final description of how clients should access servers. Semantic details that were not fully described in the NFS Version 2 specification [RFC1094] have proven, in practice, not to be a problem and have been worked out through interoperability testing. Most problems are flaws in implementations, instead of the protocol design. The NFS protocol is stateless; that is, each request contains sufficient information to be completely processed ....
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification," RFC-1094, DDN Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. NFS Version 2 protocol specification.
No context found.
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification", RFC 1094, Sun Microsystems, Inc., March 1989. NFS version 2 protocol specification.
No context found.
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification," RFC 1094, March 1989.
No context found.
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification", RFC 1094, March 1989. NFS version 2 protocol specification. http://www.internic.net/rfc/rfc1094.txt
No context found.
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification", RFC 1094, March 1989. NFS version 2 protocol specification. http://www.internic.net/rfc/rfc1094.txt
....Call (RPC) primitives built on top of an eXternal Data Representation (XDR) Implementations of the NFS version 2 protocol exist for a variety of machines, from personal computers to supercomputers. The initial version of the NFS protocol is specified in the Network File System specification [RFC1094]. A description of the initial implementation can be found in [Sandberg] The supporting MOUNT protocol performs the operating system specific functions that allow clients to attach remote directory trees to a point within the local file system. The mount process also allows the server to grant ....
Sun Microsystems, Inc., "Network Filesystem Specification," RFC-1094, DDN Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. NFS version 2 protocol specification.
No context found.
Microsystems, S. Network filesystem specification. Tech. Rep. RFC 1094, IETF, March 1989.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC