Griswold, R. E. Benchmarking Version 8 of Icon. Technical Report IPD115b, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, March 1990. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Principles of Object-Oriented Operating System Design - Campbell, Johnston, Madany, .. (1991) (8 citations) (Correct)
....efficiency makes these distinctions painfully obvious. 2 The word framework has a very specific connotation in object oriented programming, describing an interaction between instances of subclasses of a set of abstract classes. An example is the Model View Controller framework of Smalltalk [12, 15, 17]. It is in this sense that we use it in this paper. 2 the kernel of an object oriented operating system can be built as a software system that runs as if it were within an object oriented hardware environment. The objectoriented modelling approach can be generalized to subsystems and operating ....
Ralph E. Johnson. Model/view/controller, November 1988. Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Garbage Collection Alternatives for Icon - Fernandez, Hanson (1992) (1 citation) (Correct)
....that eliminate the qualifier list. Dividing memory into two equal sized regions wastes memory for programs that use mostly strings or mostly aggregates. This division complicates region expansion as described above. For example, executing the 63 small programs in the Icon program library [23] with their small test inputs generates 9,816 strings with a mean length of only 7.23 characters and a median length of 2. Strings longer than 100 characters were counted as 100 character strings, and only 2 of the 9,816 strings exceeded 100 characters. These data suggest that it might be equally ....
Ralph E. Griswold. The Icon program library. Technical Report 90-7b, Department of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, March 1990.
Garbage Collection Alternatives for Icon - Fernandez, Hanson (1992) (1 citation) (Correct)
....from new collectors. Icon [1] is a prime example. The key question is whether or not a new collector can yield significant performance improvements for most Icon programs. The remainder of this paper describes the results of implementing several new compacting collectors for version 8 of Icon [14]. Documented experiences that might help choose a collector for a specific system are scarce. Those that are available are necessarily system specific; it is often difficult to translate results from one system to another, especially if the systems differ significantly. Significant differences can ....
Ralph E. Griswold. Version 8 of Icon. Technical Report 90-1b, Department of Computer Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, February 1990.
The MT Icon Interpreter - Clinton Jeffery November Self-citation (Jeffery) (Correct)
No context found.
Griswold, R. E., Jeffery, C. L., and Townsend, G. M. Version 8.10 of the Icon Programming Language. Icon Project Document 212, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, 1993.
The Implementation of Graphics Facilities in Icon Version 9 - Jeffery (1994) Self-citation (Jeffery) (Correct)
No context found.
Griswold, R. E., Jeffery, C. L., and Townsend, G. M. Installing Version 9.0 of Icon on UNIX Platforms. Technical Report IPD243, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, June 1994.
A Framework for Monitoring Program Execution - Jeffery (1993) (Correct)
No context found.
Griswold, R. E. Benchmarking Version 8 of Icon. Technical Report IPD115b, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, March 1990.
Monitoring and Visualizing Program Execution: An Exploratory.. - Jeffery (1996) (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
Griswold, R. E. Benchmarking Version 8 of Icon. Technical Report IPD115b, Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona, March 1990.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC