Broadie, Alexander. 1991. Trust. Presentation given for the Henry Duncan prize, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 2nd December. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Optimism and Pessimism in Trust - Marsh (1994) (7 citations) (Correct)
....in y (in some given meeting) as the probability weighted by UI that x acts to achieve any outcome as if it trusts y. In other words, trust is the 3 For more on this, see [11] The distinction is in fact part of the philosophy of certain Scottish philosophers such as Adam Smith and Dugald Stewart [4]. 4 The granularity of time here is glossed over, since some situations may be of the order of seconds (e.g. my turning the radio on) and some may be far longer (my working towards a PhD, for example) degree of certainty that people act to increase one s utility. This goes along with many ....
Broadie, Alexander. 1991. Trust. Presentation given for the Henry Duncan prize, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 2nd December.
Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept - Marsh (1994) (79 citations) (Correct)
....collaborative done Blind Trust It can be seen that whilst a value of Gamma1 for complete distrust is possible, a value of 1 for complete trust is not. There is a justification for this which is founded on philosophical ideas of trust. Trust implies a consideration of something or someone (Broadie, 1991). Even a value of 0 ascribed to something (when the agent knows of that something see also chapter 6) implies some consideration of that something in order to arrive at the decision that, perhaps, more consideration is necessary. Either that, or it acknowledges that such consideration is not ....
....that such consideration is not possible, and reserves judgement. However, in this system, a value of 1 means absolute trust blind trust. It is in the name blind trust that the problem becomes apparent. Since trust necessarily means that we have searched for evidence to believe (in) something (Broadie, 1991), blind trust implies blind acceptance, a sheep like acceptance of what is. Thus, it also means that the thing being trusted is not considered at all (why bother, if one trusts it blindly ) Blind trust is not trust, as it does not involve thought and consideration of things (this definition is ....
Broadie, Alexander. 1991. Trust. Presentation given for the Henry Duncan prize, the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 2nd December.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC