11 citations found. Retrieving documents...
C. Partridge and R. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). RFC 1151, Network Information Center, April 1990.

 Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check  

This paper is cited in the following contexts:
ITP: An Image Transport Protocol for the Internet - Raman, Balakrishnan, Srinivasan (2000)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....semantics are better handled by the application and that enforcing an arbitrarily chosen ordering rule results in performance problems [24] In our work, we reinforce this approach to protocol design and refrain from imposing a particular ordering semantics across all applications. RDP [27] [28] is a reliable datagram protocol intended for ecient bulk transfer of data for remote debuggingstyle applications. RDP implements sender driven reliability and does not support receiver tailored nor applicationcontrolled reliability. NETBLT [29] is a receiver based reliable transport protocol that ....

C. Partridge and R. M. Hinden, Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP), Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr 1990, RFC 1151.


A Unified Header Compression Framework for.. - Lilley, Yang.. (2000)   (15 citations)  (Correct)

....But, at a time where wireless applications are becoming increasingly important, network protocols and particularly their headers are becoming more varied and more complex. Specialized and application specific protocols (e.g. RTP RTCP [29] RTSP [30] HTTP [9] NFS [25] AFS [14] SDP [12] RDP [26], RPC [34] Java RMI [35] various tunneling protocols, and those of popular media players [28, 3] are proliferating as the networked world moves beyond its previous staples of bulk FTP transfers and telnet. Yet these headers can be bandwidth intensive; for example, the header bandwidth of an ....

PARTRIDGE, C. AND HINDEN, R. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1990. RFC-1151.


An Image Transport Protocol for the Internet - Raman, Balakrishnan, Srinivasan (2000)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....the quality of the rendered image can be improved by 5 15 dB. enforcing an arbitrarily chosen ordering rule results in performance problems [6] In our work, we reinforce this approach to protocol design and refrain from imposing a particular ordering semantics across all applications. RDP [41, 25] is a reliable datagram protocol intended for efficient bulk transfer of data for remote debuggingstyle applications. RDP does not enforce ordered delivery unless specified by the application. It implements senderdriven reliability and does not support receiver tailored nor application controlled ....

PARTRIDGE, C., AND HINDEN, R. M. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr 1990. RFC 1151.


An Image Transport Protocol for the Internet - Raman, Balakrishnan, Srinivasan (2000)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

....ordering semantics are better handled by the application and that enforcing an arbitrarily chosen ordering rule results in performance problems [5] In our work, we reinforce this approach to protocol design and refrain from imposing a particular ordering semantics across all applications. RDP [33, 20] is a reliable datagram protocol intended for efficient bulk transfer of data for remote debugging style t 1 = 2s t 2 = 10s t 3 = 16s Figure 8. Snapshots of the displayed image with a TCP like transport (first row) with ITP (second row) and with ITP enhanced with error concealment (last row) at ....

C. Partridge and R. M. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr 1990. RFC 1151.


A Framework for Interactive Multicast Data Transport in the Internet - Raman (2000)   (Correct)

....semantics are better handled by the application and that enforcing an arbitrarily chosen ordering rule results in performance problems [19] In our work, we reinforce this approach to protocol design and refrain from imposing a particular ordering semantics across all applications. 22 RDP [138, 99] is a reliable datagram protocol intended for efficient bulk transfer of data for remote debugging style applications. RDP does not enforce ordered delivery unless specified by the application. It implements sender driven reliability and does not support receiver tailored nor ....

C. Partridge and R. M. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr 1990. RFC 1151.


FTP Extensions for Variable Protocol Specification - Allman, Ostermann (1996)   (Correct)

....with network and or transport protocols which are not Internet standards. Keyword Protocol IP4 Internet Protocol, Version 4 [Pos81a] IP6 Internet Protocol, Version 6 [DH96] Table 1: Network Protocol Tags Keyword Protocol TCP Transmission Control Protocol [Pos81b] RDP Reliable Data Protocol [PH90] Table 2: Transport Protocol Tags The net addr and trans addr are protocol specific string representations of the respective addresses. For each of the keywords given in Tables 1 and 2, addresses MUST be in the format given in Tables 3 and 4. This address format (which is the same format as ....

Craig Partridge and Robert Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP), April 1990. RFC 1151.


Long Thin Wireless Networks - Montenegro, al.   (Correct)

....congestion. However, in the wireless medium, packet losses may also be due to corruption due to high BER, fading, and so on. Here, the right approach is to try harder, instead of backing off. Alternative transport protocols are: NETBLT [NETBLT, RFC1986, RFC1030] MNCP [MNCP] ESRO [RFC2188] RDP [RFC908, RFC1151] VMTP [VMTP] 3 TCP or not This is one of the most hotly debated issues in the wireless arena. Here are some arguments against it: It is generally recognized that TCP does not perform well in the presence of significant levels of non congestion loss. TCP detractors argue that the wireless medium ....

Partridge, C., Hinden, R., Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP), RFC 1151, April 1990.


An Overview of the MESSIAHS Distributed Scheduling Support.. - Chapin, Spafford (1993)   (Correct)

....be used in developing fault tolerance and load balancing schemes. Essick [15] and Shub, et al. 13, 39] have devised architecture independent task representations. XDR [23] and ASN.1 [16, 17] specify machine independent data formats. The User Datagram Protocol [34] and Reliable Datagram Protocol [45, 32] protocols from the DARPA TCP IP protocol suite are message based protocols, and could form the basis for our information exchange prototols. 3.2 New research The remaining components constitute our research. We have designed protocols to exchange information vectors describing the resources ....

....siblings are passed to the task placement module, but are not incorporated into the system vector. 5.3. 2 The control channel The control channel is intended to be a bidirectional, reliable, message based channel, such as described by Hinden, et al. in the Reliable Datagram Protocol description [32, 45]. A control message consists of a header, including an ID number for the message and a message type, and data that depends on the type of the message. The defined control message types are sched request, sched accept, sched deny, task request, task accept, task status query, task status, task ....

C. Partridge and R. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). RFC 1151, Network Information Center, April 1990.


Scheduling Support Mechanisms for Autonomous, Heterogeneous.. - Chapin (1993)   (Correct)

....hierarchy. Methods of avoiding overestimation of system resources are discussed in chapter 4. 3.2.2. 4 The Control Channel The control channel is intended to be a bidirectional, reliable, message based channel, such as the Simple Reliable Message Protocol [Ost93] or the Reliable Datagram Protocol [PH90, VHS84] A control message consists of a header, including an ID number for the message and a message type, and data that depends on the type of the message. The following defined control message types correspond to message events: request messages, reply messages, query messages, and status ....

C. Partridge and R. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). RFC 1151, Network Information Center, April 1990.


Scheduling Support for an Internetwork of - Heterogeneous Autonomous..   (Correct)

No context found.

C. Partridge and R. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). RFC 1151, Network Information Center, April 1990.


Active Network Monitoring and Control: The SENCOMM.. - Jackson, Sterbenz.. (2002)   (2 citations)  (Correct)

No context found.

C. Partridge and R. Hinden. Version 2 of the Reliable Data Protocol (RDP). Request for Comments 1151, Internet Engineering Task Force, Apr. 1990.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC