P.-T. Kandzia and C. Schlepphorst: DOOD and DL - Do We Need an Integration. In Proceedings of the 4th KRDB Workshop, Athens, Greece, August 30, 1997. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Ontobroker: How to make the WWW Intelligent - Fensel, Decker, Erdmann, Studer (1998) (5 citations) (Correct)
....SHOE and Ontobroker also differ with respect to their inferencing capabilities. SHOE uses description logic as its basic formalism and currently offers rather limited inferencing capabilities. Ontobroker relies on Frame Logic and supports rather complex inferencing for query answering (see [Kandzia Schlepphorst, 1997], Fensel et al. to appear] for comparisons of both representation and reasoning paradigms) One can situate Ontobroker in the general context of approaches that support the integration of distributed and heterogeneous information sources like CARNOT [Collet et al. 1991] Infomaster [Genesereth ....
P.-T. Kandzia and C. Schlepphorst: DOOD and DL - Do We Need an Integration. In Proceedings of the 4th KRDB Workshop, Athens, Greece, August 30, 1997.
Ontobroker: Transforming the WWW into a Knowledge Base - Fensel, Decker, Erdmann.. (Correct)
....purpose. Technically, the main difference stems from the fact that SHOE uses description logic whereas Ontobroker relies on Frame Logic (a deductive object oriented database language) Precise comparisons of both representation and reasoning paradigms are still ongoing research activities (cf. [KaS97], FRD] Currently, there is a clear trend for offering and exploiting content descriptions of Web documents. On the one hand, some providers of browsers would like to use content descriptions for improved presentations (cf. Apple s Metacontent Format) 6 , on the other hand several automatic ....
P.-T. Kandzia and C. Schlepphorst: DOOD and DL - Do We Need an Integration. In Proceedings of the 4th KRDB Workshop, Athens, Greece, August 30, 1997.
The Technical Core of Ontobroker - Decker, Fensel, Erdmann, Studer (1 citation) (Correct)
....SHOE and Ontobroker also differ with respect to their inferencing capabilities. SHOE uses description logic as its basic formalism and currently offers rather limited inferencing capabilities. Ontobroker relies on Frame Logic and supports rather complex inferencing for query answering (see [Kandzia Schlepphorst, 1997], Fensel et al. to appear] for comparisons of both representation and reasoning paradigms) Finally, we decided to design our annotation language as a small extension of HTML because most documents on the web use this formalism. However, there are some new trends which we have to be aware. The ....
P.-T. Kandzia and C. Schlepphorst: DOOD and DL - Do We Need an Integration. In Proceedings of the 4th KRDB Workshop, Athens, Greece, August 30, 1997.
Ontobroker: Ontology based Access to Distributed and.. - Decker, Erdmann.. (1998) (82 citations) (Correct)
No context found.
P.-T. Kandzia and C. Schlepphorst: DOOD and DL - Do We Need an Integration. In: Proceedings of the 4th KRDB Workshop, Athens, Greece, August 30, 1997.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC