| G. Kanizsa, Amodal completion: seeing or thinking? in: J. Beck (Ed.), Organisation and Representation in Preception, Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1982, pp. 167--190. |
....the form taken by an amodal completion (the shape that is completed or amodally perceived to be behind the occluder) follows complex principles of its own which are generally not rational principles, such as semantic coherence or even something like maximum likelihood. As Kanizsa (1985) and Kanizsa Gerbino (1982) have persuasively argued, these principles do not appear to reflect a tendency for the simplest description of the world and they are insensitive to knowledge and expectations, and even to the effects of learning (Kanizsa, 1969) For example, Figure 1 shows a case of amodal completion in which ....
Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In B. Beck (Ed.), Organization and Representation in Perception (pp. 167-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
No context found.
G. Kanizsa, Amodal completion: seeing or thinking? in: J. Beck (Ed.), Organisation and Representation in Preception, Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1982, pp. 167--190.
No context found.
G. Kanizsa, Amodal completion: seeing or thinking? in: J. Beck (Ed.), Organisation and Representation in Preception, Erlbaum, New Jersey, 1982, pp. 167--190.
No context found.
G. Kanizsa and W. Gerbino. Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck, editor, Organization and representation in perception, pages 167-190, 1982.
No context found.
Kanisza, G. and Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In Beck, J., editor, Organization and representation in perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
No context found.
Kanisza, G. and Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In Beck, J., editor, Organization and representation in perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC