David Berry. SML resources. sent to the SML mailing list by db@lfcs.ed.ac.uk, May 1991.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles

....2 (the only modern platform on which they both run) Indeed, Poly ML compiles about 43 faster (when it doesn t blow up) but SML NJ programs run five times faster than Poly ML programs, on the average (geometric mean) SML NJ reportedly uses about 1. 5 times as much heap space for execution[10]; and on a 68020 based platform (like a Sun 3) SML NJ may not do relatively as well (since we don t generate really good code for that machine) So on obsolete machines with tiny memories, Poly ML may do almost as well as SML NJ. Figure 2 compares implementations of several programming languages ....

David Berry. SML resources. sent to the SML mailing list by db@lfcs.ed.ac.uk, May 1991.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC