Beck M, Moore T. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure Project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems 1998; 30(22/23):2141--2148.  Home/Search   Document Details and Download   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....server can use information about the number of requests per unit time sent to a Web site as well as geographic information. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure Project proposed a DNS that implements address resolution based on network proximity information, such as round trip delays [8]. One of the problems with load balancing using DNS is that name to IP mappings resulting from a DNS lookup may be cached anywhere along the path between a client and a server. This can cause load imbalance because client requests can then bypass the DNS server entirely and go directly to a ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure Project: An Architecture for Internet Content Channels. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Caching Workshop, 1998.

....server among these. To decide, the resolver may issue probes to the servers and choose based on response times to these probes, or it may collect reports from the clients on performance of past accesses to these servers. This approach is used by Bhattacharjee et al. BAZF97] and by Beck and Moore [BM98] Its advantage is that no extra communication is added to the critical path of request processing. There are also several shortcomings. First, the approach relies on clients using a customized DNS resolver. If this resolver relies on client performance reports, then the client (i.e. browser or ....

Micah Beck and Terry Moore. The internet-2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. In Proceedings of the 3rd International WWW Caching Workshop, Manchester, UK, June 1998.

....with 256 MB of memory. NetSolve agent: The NetSolve agent was launched on one of the computational servers used in the experiment. Staging Point: The staging point is implemented by an IBP server [13] running on an Internet2 machine dedicated to serving storage to network applications [3]. This machine is housed at the University of Tennessee. Experimental setup: All reported experiments were performed between the hours of 8:00 AM and 11:00 PM (EDT) during the months of May and June 2000. All components of the experiments were running in a work stealing mode, with a nice value ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(2223) :2141--2148, 1998.

....access to information, but the important issue of its preservation has yet to be e ectively addressed. The importance of this issue is now apparent as the general objective of preservation has received considerable recent attention [6, 11, 2, 9, 7, 14, 10, 13] In addition, other projects such as [3] appear to be at a formative stage. The notion of Archival Intermemory was introduced in [8] The authors are listed in alphabetical order. At the time this prototype was designed all authors were with NEC Research Institute, 4 Independence Way, Princeton, NJ 08540. The rst author is also ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. University of Tennessee, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report, August 1998.

....the third is now with Intertrust Corporation, the fourth is also with New York University, and the fth with the University of Washington. Direct correspondence to the sixth author at pny research.nj.nec.com. considerable recent attention [5, 2, 7, 9, 10] In addition, other projects such as [3] appear to be at a formative stage. The notion of Archival Intermemory was introduced in [6] The Intermemory project aims to develop largescale highly survivable and available storage systems made up of widely distributed processors that are individually untrustworthy with the overall system ....

Beck, M., and Moore, T. The internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. University of Tennessee, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report, August 1998.

....of application developers who are in dire need of the resources that a computational Grid will offer. Arguments can be made as to how much the Grid can help both traditional computational scientists (biologists, chemists, physicists, etc. and non scientists as well (such as film distributors [BM98] The computer scientists working in the area almost uniformly consult application scientists so that their work will aid the needs of this user base, which was also the motivation behind the development of an Applications User Working Group [App00] as part of the Grid Forum. However, at the ....

M. Beck and R. Moore. The internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, pages 2141--2148, 1998.

....computation, accurate performance estimations to guide the selection of dataset replicas, and other advanced techniques that collectively maximize use of scarce storage, networking, and computing resources. The literature offers numerous point solutions that address these issues (e.g. see [17,14,19, 3]) But no integrating architecture exists that allows us to identify requirements and components common to different systems and hence apply differenttechnologies in a coordinated fashion to a range of dataintensivepetabyte scale application domains. Motivated by these considerations, wehave ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet contentchannels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(22-23):2141--2148, 1998.

....computation, accurate performance estimations to guide the selection of dataset replicas, and other advanced techniques that collectively maximize use of scarce storage, networking, and computing resources. The literature o#ers numerous point solutions that address these issues (e.g. see [17, 14, 19, 3]) But no integrating architecture exists that allows us to identify requirements and components common to di#erent systems and hence apply di#erent technologies in a coordinated fashion to a range of dataintensive petabyte scale application domains. Motivated by these considerations, we have ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(22-23):2141--2148, 1998.

....best e#ort delivery provided by today s Internet. Film distributors can use such a computationally enhanced network (or grid [4]asitissometimes called) for the e#cient and secure distribution of digital video, using embedded resources for the caching, compression, and encryption of video streams [1]. The climate change community can use a grid to deliver climate data products ( daily mean temperature, frost frequencies in Wisconsin, impacts on cranberry bog yields ) to scientists and policymakers; in this case the grid might not only cache datasets but also run the computations required ....

....services with inherently distributed implementations. For example: Content distribution services, which use a combination of embedded storage (e.g. for caching or mirroring) and computation (e.g. for compression or distillation) to deliver collections of files to end user communities [1]. Value added services which enhance content via indexing, annotation, distillation, translation, an so forth. Distributed active data repositories [2] which generate new data from old by running owner or user supplied code. Markets for computational services, which enhance the ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(2223) :2141--2148, 1998.

....a server among these. To decide, the resolver may issue probes to the servers and choose based on response times to these probes, or it may collect reports from the the client on performance of passed accesses to these servers. This approach is used by Bhattacharjee et al. [5] and by Beck and Moore [4]. Its advantage is that no extra communication is added to the critical path of request processing. There are also several shortcomings. First, the approach relies on clients using a customized DNS resolver. If this resolver relies on client performance reports, then the client (i.e. browser or ....

Micah Beck and Terry Moore. The Internet-2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. In 3rd Int. WWW Caching Workshop, Manchester, UK, June 1998. Available at http://wwwcache.ja.net/events/workshop/18/mbeck2.html.

....(or L Bone) is a collection of IBP servers deployed in the Internet for the specific purpose of offering network storage to applications. The LBone will initially make use of some of the resources of the servers being deployed by the Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure (I2 DSI) project [4]. 1 These currently consist of five servers donated by IBM with 72GB of disk storage and 900GB of tape storage each and one server donated by StorageTek with 700GB of disk. Each site runs an IBP server that offers at least 20 gigabytes of storage for time limited and or volatile allocation. ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(2223) :2141--2148, 1998.

....as storage depots. 2 I2 DSI and IBP A central assumption of IBP Mail is that storage exists in the network. Given the legacy Internet infrastructure, this is not a valid assumption. However, the infrastructure of the Internet is changing. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure (I2 DSI) [1] project is paving the way for storage resources to be added to the network commons. Currently, I2 DSI has received donations of five machines from IBM that each contain 2 gigabytes of RAM, 72 gigabytes of disk storage and 900 gigabytes of tape storage. These are distributed around the country ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(22-23):2141--2148, 1998.

....large files that has better performance and fewer administrative details. It is based on the ability to explicitly manage storage in the network, and therefore to use the network to buffer messages. This ability is at the core of the Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure (I2 DSI) project [BM98], described below in Section 2. We make use of a piece of middleware called the Internet Backplane Protocol (IBP) that allows us to manage and use storage in the network. The result is a mechanism that we call IBP MIME. The basic structure of IBP MIME is as follows. The sender stores the file to ....

....and possible areas of future work in section 6. 2 I2 DSI The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure (I2 DSI) initiative is one part of the Internet2 project. I2 DSI s stated goal is to resolve accessibility issues associated with sharing and using Internet based educational content [BM98]. A fundamental principle of I2 DSI is that explicit storage in the network is necessary to achieve high performance in future generation networking. To that end, the I2 DSI project has received donations of (currently five) large storage servers that are deployed throughout the United States. At ....

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(22-23):2141--2148, 1998.

No context found.

Beck M, Moore T. The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure Project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems 1998; 30(22/23):2141--2148.

No context found.

BECK, M., AND MOORE, R. The internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems (1998), 2141-2148.

No context found.

Beck, M., and Moore, T. The Internet-2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for Internet content channels . 3rd Int'l WWW Caching Workshop, Manchester, UK (June 1998). http://wwwcache.ja.net/events/workshop/18/mbeck2.html.

No context found.

M. Beck and T. Moore. The Internet2 distributed storage infrastructure project: An architecture for internet content channels. Computer Networking and ISDN Systems, 30(22-23):2141--2148, 1998.

No context found.

M. Beck, T. Moore, \The Internet2 Distributed Storage Infrastructure project: An architecture for Internet content channels", Proc. of 3rd Workshop on WWW Caching, Manchester, England, June 1998.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC