| K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, chapter 2. Wiley, New York, 1974. |
....is impossible to achieve an approximation factor of O(n 3 ) unless NP = P [8] Thus, preemptions really seem to be essential. Minimizing the ow time on one machine with preemption can be done optimally in polynomial time using the natural algorithm shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) [4]. For more than one machine the preemptive problem becomes NP hard [5] Only very recently, Leonardi and Raz [8] showed that SRPT achieves logarithmic approximation for the multiprocessor case, showing a tight bound of O(log(minfn=m; Pg) on m 1 machines with n jobs, where P denotes the ratio ....
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, 1974.
....O(n ) approximation factor unless NP = P [7] Thus, preemptions really seem to be essential. Existing work: single processor. Minimizing the flow time on one machine with preemption can be done optimally in polynomial time using the natural algorithm shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) [1]. Existing work: multiple processors with migration. For more than one machine the preemptive problem becomes NP hard [2] Only very recently, Leonardi and Raz [7] STOC 97) showed that SRPT achieves logarithmic approximation for the multiprocessor case, showing a tight bound of O(log(min(n=m; ....
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, 1974.
....optimal one. Many different approaches have been proposed in this area (which is very well researched due to its pertinence to practical applications of scheduling) These include generation of active schedules in [GT60] and its variant on generating non active schedules, neighbourhood search in [Bak74] with a recent approach in [SWV92] and the shifting bottleneck procedure in [ABZ88] Here we concentrate on the generation of non delay schedules using priority rules. A non delay schedule is one in which no machine remains inactive when there exists a task which could be executed on the ....
K. R Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley, New York, 1974.
....O(n ) approximation factor unless NP = P [7] Thus, preemptions really seem to be essential. Existing work: single processor. Minimizing the flow time on one machine with preemption can be done optimally in polynomial time using the natural algorithm shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) [1]. Existing work: multiple processors with migration. For more than one machine the preemptive problem becomes NP hard [2] Only very recently, Leonardi and Raz [7] STOC 97) showed that SRPT achieves logarithmic approximation for the multiprocessor case, showing a tight bound of ....
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, 1974.
....by the master) slave work (performed by the slaves) and post processing (performed by the master) 4. for each job, the tasks are to be performed in the order: pre processing, slave work, post processing. The master slave scheduling model may be regarded as a generalized job shop (see [1, 2] for a definition of a job shop as well as for elementary terminology concerning scheduling) as described below: 1. the job shop has two classes of machines: master and slave 2. there is exactly one master machine and the number of slave machines equals the number of jobs 3. each job has three ....
K. Baker, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, John Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, chapter 2. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, chapter 2. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, chapter 2. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, J. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, J. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker. Introduction to sequencing and scheduling. Wiley & Sons, 1974.
No context found.
BAKER, K. Introduction to sequencing and scheduling. John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
No context found.
Kenneth R. Baker, Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling, John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
No context found.
Baker K.R. (1974), "Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling ", John Wiley, New York.
No context found.
K. R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
K. R. Baker. Introduction to sequencing and scheduling. John Wiley and Sons, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New York, 1974.
No context found.
Baker, K.R. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, 1974.
No context found.
K.R. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, 1974.
No context found.
K. Baker. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. 1974.
No context found.
Baker, K.R. "Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling," Wiley, 1974.
First 50 documents Next 50
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC