Y. Rekhter and Richard Colella. TUBA mobility support. Network Working Group Internet Draft draft-ietf-tuba-mobility-00.txt, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 16 May 1994. Working Draft; expires 16 November 1994.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles

....the default IS associated with the destination ES, the transit IS will not attempt to readdress the datagram. We believe that the method proposed by Tanaka and Tsukamoto is a promising technique for handling mobility within a single area. One of the candidates for a next generation IP is the TUBA [21, 50] proposal, which would replace IP with CLNP. TUBA includes enhancements to CLNP that would allow datagrams to be routed to mobile ESs. The design is nearly identical to that proposed by the IETF Mobile IP working group; in fact, the draft specification [50] acknowledges that it was copied almost ....

....for a next generation IP is the TUBA [21, 50] proposal, which would replace IP with CLNP. TUBA includes enhancements to CLNP that would allow datagrams to be routed to mobile ESs. The design is nearly identical to that proposed by the IETF Mobile IP working group; in fact, the draft specification [50] acknowledges that it was copied almost verbatim from the IETF s text. The Cellular Digital Packet Data CDPD [10] network uses idle transmission capacity in the North American analog cellular telephony network to transmit IP and CLNP datagrams. CDPD follows the ISO OSI connectionless routing ....

Y. Rekhter and Richard Colella. TUBA mobility support. Network Working Group Internet Draft draft-ietf-tuba-mobility-00.txt, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 16 May 1994. Working Draft; expires 16 November 1994.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC