G. Pisier: The Volume of Convex Bodies and Banach Space Geometry. Cambridge University Press Cambridge (1989)  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....design an ontology which is simple enough to understand without being simplistic, yet expressive enough that most researchers can represent the key claims made in most documents. More elaborate argumentation schemes have been proposed for computer supported argumentation (e.g. 26] 34] 38] [40]) but our analysis of this literature shows little evidence of successful uptake (see discussion) The ScholOnto scheme therefore supports argumentation in relatively simple terms (supports, raises issues with, and refutes) to make it as easy as possible to add an argumentation link to a concept ....

Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1958

....services, but leaving the document texts to express the details and nuances of an author s argument. This minimizes the effort required to submit a document description. Numerous more elaborate argumentation schemes have been proposed for computer supported argumentation (e.g. 37] 49] 54] 8 [56]) but our analysis of this literature shows usability and literacy obstacles to their successful uptake (see discussion) 1 Moreover, whilst rigorous and carefully maintained argumentation networks enable more powerful computational analysis (a primary motivation for increasing a schema s ....

Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1958

....of scripts is represented by means of plan operators. In the sales scenario, plan operators that implement argumentative strategies play a central role. There has been a great deal of work on argumentation ranging from formal models of argument structure, such as Toulmin s classical work [25], to generative approaches, such as [14] and [28] Our work differs from these approaches in that it does not just generate arguments for a single agent, but allocates the parts of an argumentative discourse to a team of presenters. Consequently, our plan operators do not only handle the ....

Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1958.

....of scripts is represented by means of plan operators. In the sales scenario, plan operators that implement argumentative strategies play a central role. There has been a great deal of work on argumentation ranging from formal models of argument structure, such as Toulmin s classical work (cf. [25]) to generative approaches, such as [14] and [28] Our work differs from this work in that it does not just generate arguments for a single agent, but distributes the parts of an argumentative discourse to a team of presenters. Consequently, our plan operators do not only handle the specification ....

Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1958.

....that Englebart s framework 1 embraced not only cognitive tools, but notational and training issues, facets of DR research on which we focus in more detail towards the end of this paper. The second root concerns the representational form for arguments. The Uses of Argument by Stephen Toulmin [16] was originally written as a challenge to the dominance in philosophy of formal, Aristotelian logic. Toulmin s aim was to develop a view of logic which was grounded in the study of reasoning practice. Taking argumentation as the most common form of practical everyday reasoning, he posed the ....

....were aliens he has become a naturalised American A man born in Bemuda will generally be a British subject See legal statutes. Harry is a British subject Harry was born in Bermuda Claim Datum Warrant Backing Rebuttal Certainly FIGURE 1: An example of Toulmin s graphical argument structure [16] . The purpose of this review is to set the conceptual background for the use of argumentationbased DR, so the considerable amount of debate which Toulmin s model stimulated is not of immediate relevance. Further discussion can be found in Hair and Lewis [17] and Newman and Marshall [18] who set ....

The Uses of Argument. Toulmin, S., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1958.

....al. 1995) In the law and AI community, the primary focus of the study of discourse structure has been argument theory, the study of the relationships within multi sentential texts that are intended to persuade, justify, establish, or prove. An influential model of argument structure proposed by Toulmin (1958) analyzed argumentative texts in terms of the concepts of warrant, ground, conclusion, backing, and qualification. This model has been used for explanation generation (Zeleznikow Stranieri 1995) and for document drafting in PLAID (Bench Capon Staniford 1995) PLAID produces a document by ....

S. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument' (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1958).

No context found.

G. Pisier: The Volume of Convex Bodies and Banach Space Geometry. Cambridge University Press Cambridge (1989)

No context found.

N. Frijda. The Emotions. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1986.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC