Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct methods for n-body simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--418. Academic Press, Inc., 1985.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....supported by NSF grant No. 9303223 and DAMTP. 1 1 Introduction This paper describes the design of efficient time reversible regularized adaptive methods for long term integration of Coulombic few body problems. The stable computation of trajectories is important for astronomical applications [17, 22, 1] and in the classical and semi classical studies of atomic systems, particularly atoms in highly excited ( Rydberg atom ) states [12, 30, 7, 28, 23, 25, 13, 31] Calculations of relevant stochastic quantities (average escape time, orbital dimension, etc. may require long time integrations. Using ....

.... Deltat H ffi exp 1 2 Deltat H O( Deltat 2 ) where exp tH is simply notation for the time t flow map of of the Hamiltonian H . We then solve H by introducing new variables Q, P and integrating the reparameterized system H = jQj 2 ( H Gamma H 0 ) 5. 21) In standard practice [1], non symplectic, non reversible methods would be used to integrate (5.21) In general it is found necessary to employ some sort of variable stepsize procedure in addition to the use of regularization. We also found it necessary to incorporate a variable stepsize, but we do so in a timereversible ....

Aarseth, S.J., Direct methods for N-body simulation, in Multiple Time Scales, eds. J.U. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen, Academic Press, NY, 1985.

....and topological structure continues to generate a great deal of mathematical and physical interest (see [16] and other recent references therein) The numerical simulation problem also remains of terri c importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [31, 23, 1], and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [24, 6, 27] While many numerical schemes for the N body problem have been developed over the years [9, 1] these codes may exhibit de ciencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to improving ....

....also remains of terri c importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [31, 23, 1] and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [24, 6, 27] While many numerical schemes for the N body problem have been developed over the years [9, 1], these codes may exhibit de ciencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to improving the qualitative behavior of numerical simulation methods is to incorporate some of the many geometric properties of the phase ow, such as time reversal symmetry, symplectic ....

Aarseth, S.J., Direct methods for N-body simulation, in Multiple Time Scales, eds. J.U. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen, Academic Press, NY, 1985.

....and topological structure continues to generate a great deal of mathematical and physical interest (see [16] and other recent references therein) The numerical simulation problem also remains of terri c importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [31, 23, 1], and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [24, 6, 27] While many numerical schemes for the # body problem have been developed over the years [9, 1] these codes may exhibit de ciencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to ....

....also remains of terri c importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [31, 23, 1] and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [24, 6, 27] While many numerical schemes for the # body problem have been developed over the years [9, 1], these codes may exhibit de ciencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to improving the qualitative behavior of numerical simulation methods is to incorporate some of the many geometric properties of the phase ow, such as time reversal symmetry, symplectic ....

Aarseth, S.J., Direct methods for N-body simulation, in ######## #### ######, eds. J.U. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen, Academic Press, NY, 1985.

....to small perturbations If shadows can be shown to exist in large collisional N body systems, it may allow them to be simulated with simpler algorithms that ignore small perturbations that until now were thought to be important to include in models of N body systems. For example, Aarseth s [1] N body integrator is a popular one for collisional systems. It includes regularization, in which close encounters between 2 particles are solved using the analytical 2body solution with perturbations from the other particles. If a shadow can be shown to exist for such a numerical solution, it may ....

....far, not much has been said about the noisy integrator, other than that it has less accuracy than the accurate integrator. Eventually, shadowing should be attempted while using the same noisy integrator that astronomers commonly use often leapfrog for collisionless systems, and Aarseth s [1] for collisional systems, and usually with individual timesteps for each particle. If it turns out that long shadows do not exist for the integrators already in common use, but shadows do exist for other noisy integrators, it may be necessary for shadowing researchers to dictate to simulation ....

Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct Methods for N-Body Simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--418. Academic Press, Inc., 1985.

....supported by NSF grant No. 9303223 and DAMTP. 1 1 Introduction This paper describes the design of efficient time reversible regularized adaptive methods for long term integration of Coulombic few body problems. The stable computation of trajectories is important for astronomical applications [23, 28, 1] and in the classical and semi classical studies of atomic systems, particularly atoms in highly excited ( Rydberg atom ) states [15, 37, 10, 35, 29, 32, 16, 38] Calculations of relevant stochastic quantities (average escape time, orbital dimension, etc. may require long time integrations. Using ....

.... Deltat H ffi exp 1 2 Deltat H O( Deltat 3 ) where exp tH is simply notation for the time t flow map of of the Hamiltonian H . We then solve H by introducing new variables Q, P and integrating the reparameterized system H = jQj 2 ( H Gamma H 0 ) 5. 21) In standard practice [1], non symplectic, non reversible methods would be used to integrate (5.21) In general it is found necessary to employ some sort of variable stepsize procedure in addition to the use of regularization. We also found it necessary to incorporate a variable stepsize, but we do so in a timereversible ....

Aarseth, S.J., Direct methods for N-body simulation, in Multiple Time Scales, eds. J.U. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen, Academic Press, NY, 1985.

....and topological structure continues to generate a great deal of mathematical and physical interest (see [14] and other recent references therein) The numerical simulation problem also remains of terrific importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [29, 21, 1], and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [22, 5, 25] While many numerical schemes for the N body problem have been developed over the years [7, 1] these codes may exhibit deficiencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to ....

....also remains of terrific importance. This problem is solved routinely in studies of steller and planetary dynamics [29, 21, 1] and related problems arise in quasiclassical studies of atomic systems [22, 5, 25] While many numerical schemes for the N body problem have been developed over the years [7, 1], these codes may exhibit deficiencies in very long time integration or in scattering studies. One approach to improving the qualitative behavior of numerical simulation methods is to incorporate some of the many geometric properties of the phase flow, such as time reversal symmetry, symplectic ....

Aarseth, S.J., Direct methods for N-body simulation, in Multiple Time Scales, eds. J.U. Brackbill and B.I. Cohen, Academic Press, NY, 1985.

....paper is Channel and Scovel [13] The question of what kind of integrator to use to integrate N body systems is one that has had plenty of attention. No discussion of stellar system N body integrators would be complete without mention of Aarseth s classic integration scheme for collisional systems [1], which includes regularization. Makino [55] derived formulae for optimal order and timestep criteria for Aarseth type integrators. For collisionless N body systems, and indeed many non astronomical Hamiltonian systems, symplectic integrators have enjoyed widespread popularity. Recent years have ....

....is typical for non interacting stars. Multiple star systems form an integral part of the evolution of globular clusters, and thus cannot be ignored. Without special treatment the integration of tight binary star systems can soak up the majority of your CPU time and slow the simulation immensely [1]. Regularization is the process of speeding up the simulation of these orbits by solving them analytically as perturbed two body systems. Here are some more terms that are not to do with stellar dynamics, but astronomy in general. Dark Matter matter that we can t see, but we know must exist for ....

Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct Methods for N-Body Simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--418. Academic Press, Inc., 1985.

....large systems) are a valuable resource for efficient force directed graph layout. A further improvement in execution speed may be possible by applying an approach in which individual time step sizes are assigned to each equation, based on a local solution accuracy criterion [82, 83]. Chapter 4 3D Layered drawings of directed graphs Directed graphs are graphs in which the vertices at the ends of each edge form an ordered pair, that is, a direction is associated with each edge. In directed graphs which model relational information, this direction attribute of edges commonly ....

Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct Methods for N-Body Simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--418. Academic Press, Inc., 1985.

....is entirely possible for D partial to vary from one particle to the next. One can use this to fine tune the errors associated with different bodies if external considerations make it important to achieve high accuracy on only a subset of bodies, e.g. if an individual timestep integrator is in use [17, 18, 19]. One can also achieve control of relative errors rather than absolute errors. There are two possibilities. If one has access to an estimate of the exact acceleration (partial or total) perhaps from the previous timestep, then one can simply arrange that D partial be set to some chosen fraction ....

S. J. Aarseth. Direct methods for N-body simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, edited by J. U. Brackbill and B. I.Cohen, (Academic Press, New York, 1985), p.377.

.... total interaction = acceleration between the two particles else if ( ensemble.diameter distance(p,ensemble.centroid) total interaction = acceleration between particle and ensemble else total interaction = BH Interaction(p, ensemble.child[0] BH Interaction(p, ensemble.child[1]) BH Interaction(p, ensemble.child[2] BH Interaction(p, ensemble.child[3] fi fi return total interaction end BH Interaction Figure 6: Barnes Hut algorithm 5 IMPROVING SERIAL SIMULATIONS 18 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 users x 10 3 5.00 10.00 ....

....Multipole; 4. using the value computed in the previous step, form a new Taylor series expansion for this particle and determine its next update time; 5. schedule next update for this particle; Forming the Taylor series for a potential function is not a very simple step. As described by Aarseth [1], derivatives of the potential function can be computed by divided differences and the total process requires 30 floating point variables and the computation of several polynomials to obtain the Taylor coefficients. The interesting fact is that, once the mathematics is worked out, one reaches a ....

Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct methods for N-body simulations. In Jeremiah U. Brackbill and Bruce I. Cohen, editors, Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--436. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL, 1985.

No context found.

Sverre J. Aarseth. Direct methods for n-body simulations. In Multiple Time Scales, pages 377--418. Academic Press, Inc., 1985.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC