"Strategies for Contributing to Collaborative Arguments" in Proceedings of the14th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp755-760  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

.... structuring the IBIS system of (Rittel and Webber, 1973) as extended by (Conklin and Begeman, 1988) Distinct again from support and medium oriented research, computational representation of argument is also employed to pedagogical ends (in teaching skills of both argument production, e.g. (Cavalli Sforza et al. 1992), Pilkington et al. 1992) and argument criticism, Cavalli Sforza et al. 1993) and finally, as a means of abstracting from particular data sources and thus facilitating representation of arguments drawing on disparate and possibly conflicting sources (implemented in Haggith s FORA system ....

"Strategies for Contributing to Collaborative Arguments" in Proceedings of the14th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp755-760

.... structuring the IBIS system of (Rittel and Webber, 1973) as extended by (Conklin and Begeman, 1988) Distinct again from support and medium oriented research, computational representation of argument is also employed to pedagogical ends (in teaching skills of both argument production, e.g. (Cavalli Sforza et al. 1992), Pilkington et al. 1992) and argument criticism, Cavalli Sforza et al. 1993) and finally, as a means of abstracting from particular data sources and thus facilitating representation of arguments drawing on disparate and possibly conflicting sources (implemented in Haggith s FORA system ....

"Strategies for Contributing to Collaborative Arguments" in Proceedings of the14th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp755-760

....non demonstrative reason: presumably some statistical claim about flying s frequency among birds. Counterargument can attack any of these elements. Toulmin diagrams can be chained for visual effect and are currently investigated mainly for user interface applications (Marshall et al. 1991) and Cavalli Sforza et al. 1992). Toulmin s essay is of historical interest and suggests that the proper formalism will be found in modal deontic logic, which was fashionable at the time. A problem with Toulmin s essay is that little guidance is given regarding the distinction between datum and backing. Readers of ....

....As mentioned earlier, there is work in AI on non demonstrative argument and process in the communities of natural language, education, and legal reasoning that is less formal. The recent symposium on argument and belief (see Alvarado 1991) abstracts much of the relevant work. Alvarado (1990) and Cavalli Sforza Moore (1992) are excellent examples of the semi formal analysis of argument that can be found in these AI communities. 16 Computational Intelligence 6. NON MONOTONIC REASONING AND OTHER DISPUTATIONS 6.1. Elements Disputations can have multiple parties. Mostly they have two parties, pro and con. Sometimes ....

Cavalli-Sforza, V., A. Lesgold, and A. Weiner. "Strategies for contributing to collaborative arguments, " Proc. Cognitive Science, 1992.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC