Dan R. Olsen, Jr. "Larger Issues in User Interface Management". Computer Graphics 21, 2 (April 1987), 134-137. Home/Search Document Not in Database Summary Related Articles Check |
This paper is cited in the following contexts:
Integrating Database and Dialogue Design - Schewe, Schewe (2000) (Correct)
....Work In the eld of database design the issue of user interfaces has not attracted much attention [3] Recent research in this eld is either concerned with the coupling of DBMSs and tools such as speci c editors, report and mask generators, repositories etc. or with extensions of general UIMSs [22, 33]. For example, O2Look [6] is a graphical interface for the O 2 system which allow graphical object presentations to be de ned by the user; similar tools have been developed for GOOD [14] The DUET project [8] provides speci c libraries with database speci c graphical primitives combined with ....
D.R. Olsen. Larger issues in user interface management. Computer Graphics. vol. 2, 1987.
Demonstrational and Constraint-Based Techniques for.. - Zanden, Myers (1995) (3 citations) (Correct)
....for the more common Lisp arithmetic commands. More complex constraints are not likely to be attempted by non programmers anyway. Since the programmers are likely to already know Lisp (because the application is written in it) there is a tremendous disadvantage to making them learn a new language [36]. Lapidary 18 Box D Box E Box C Box B Box A Box D Box E Box C Box B Box A Box D Box E Box C Box B Box A (a) b) c) Figure 11: Arrows are connected to the centers of the boxes by constraints so they stay attached even when the objects are moved. In (a) and (b) the endpoints ....
Dan R. Olsen, Jr. "Larger Issues in User Interface Management". Computer Graphics 21, 2 (April 1987), 134-137.
User Interface Languages: A Survey of Existing Methods - Abowd, Bowen, Dix.. (1989) (6 citations) (Correct)
....has many theoretical drawbacks. In practice, also, experience of using grammars has not been positive. Two complaints are voiced. Firstly, specifying the dialogue in a separate language or formalism from the application functionality is often difficult. SYNGRAPH was not widely used for this reason [94]. The only real solution is to generate the dialogue automatically. Green [40] proposes this, but there are few prototypes [87] Secondly, parsing user input according to the grammar often presents problems. Hekmatpour and Woodman complain of this [52] In recent papers, Olsen, Hudson, and Hill ....
....Green [40] proposes this, but there are few prototypes [87] Secondly, parsing user input according to the grammar often presents problems. Hekmatpour and Woodman complain of this [52] In recent papers, Olsen, Hudson, and Hill have strongly criticised the syntactic approach to input. Olsen [94] thinks that ease of use is often more critical to the success of a UIMS than syntactic capability. Having used syntactic input parsing in the SYNGRAPH and GRINS, Olsen s latest system, MIKE [92] abandons the syntactic component. Coutaz similarly abandons the single dialogue component in her PAC ....
D.R. Olsen. Larger issues in user interface management. ACM Computer Graphics, 21:134-- 137, 1987.
The Lapidary Graphical Interface Design Tool - Brad Vander Zanden (1 citation) (Correct)
No context found.
Dan R. Olsen, Jr. "Larger Issues in User Interface Management". Computer Graphics 21, 2 (April 1987), 134-137.
Graphical User Interface Programming - Myers (2003) (Correct)
No context found.
Dan R. Olsen Jr. "Larger Issues in User Interface Management," Computer Graphics. 1987. 21(2). pp. 134-137.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC