Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....items in STM. Whether or not information will also be stored in LTM is not specified by Baddeley s theory, because it is a theory of working memory only. Work by Craik and Lockhart indicates, that the extent in which rehearsed information is stored in LTM depends on the level of processing (Craik Lockhart, 1972). This led to the distinction between maintenance rehearsal and elaborate rehearsal. Maintenance rehearsal is used just to retain information for a short time, for example a telephone number that needs to be dialled. During elaborate rehearsal on the other hand further processing is done on the ....

Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11, 671-684.

....1957) Control: to Construct or Deconstruct . Construct or modify properties of and or relationships between learning objects . Create personal narratives Gestalt (Wertheimer, 1959) Lateral Thinking (de Bono, 1967) Experiential (Rogers, 1969) Dual Coding (Paivio, 1986) Levels of Processing (Craik Lockhart, 1972); Script (Schank, 1982) Component Display (Merrill, 1983) Cognitive Flexibility (Spiro, Feltovich, Jacobson Coulson, 1992) Prompt for engagement . Generate original responses Originality (Maltzman, 1960) Constructivist (Bruner, 1960) Scaffolding; Modelling . Assemble or disassemble ....

..... Ensure interactions implemented Contiguity (Guthrie, 1930) Drive Reduction (Hull, 1943) Engagement . Integrate meaningful engagement through access to different content representations . Enable the means to control displayed media elements Dual Coding (Paivio, 1986) Levels of Processing (Craik Lockhart, 1972) Content Dependent . Vary structural presentation as a function of content domain . Enable learner elaboration of epitomes Algo Heuristic (Landa, 1974) Component Display (Merrill, 1983) Elaboration (Reigeluth, 1992) Multimedia . Enable the means to select media used to display content ....

Craik, F. & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

....ability to recall the previous presentation. Importantly, manipulations long known to impact explicit recall, such as elaborative processing, have no effect upon implicit memory at the perceptual level (Jacoby and Dallas 1981) In fact, the traditional levelsof processing hierarchy of effects (Craik and Lockhart 1972) is reversed for perceptual implicit memory, with low levels of processing resulting in greater implicit perceptual memory benefits, while high levels of elaborative processing result in little or no benefits. Other dissociations between implicit and explicit memory have been identified as well, ....

.... processing and a peripheral or heuristic route to persuasion, higher levels of involvement promote deep, semantic level processing and a central or systematic route (Cacioppo and Petty 1982) Further, more elaborative processing increases explicit memory performance compared to shallower levels (Craik and Lockhart 1972). As implicit memory phenomena have received more attention, levels of processing effects have also been investigated and have shown that elaborative processing has effects upon tests of conceptual implicit memory but no effect upon perceptual implicit memory (Jacoby and Dallas 1981, Graf and ....

Craik, Fergus I.M. and Robert S. Lockhart (1972), "Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research," Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 11, 671-684.

....and ellipses; cf. JW82] Andr e 88] and [Sch91] 23 cf. Dan69, p. 94 (transl. J.S. 24 This does not mean that listeners of broadcasted sports reports always generate visual mental images. The reconstruction of the referents constitutes an already very high level of understanding (cf. CL72] and also [Lei37, x24] 25 Though, these listeners are assumed to function mentally in a way corresponding to the simplicity of SOCCER; i.e. they perceive similarly to SOCCER and know more or less the same about spatio temporal relations and composed events. If radio reporters could not rely ....

F.J.M. Craik and R.S. Lockheart. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11?:671--684, 1972. 34

....picture at the basic level. The parahippG was speci#cally engaged by subordinate level semantic judgments. This area was also activated in the Semantic task using animal names in Binder et al. #1997#, who suggested that processing at a semantic level mayhave enhanced storage of episodic memories #Craik Lockhart, 1972; Zola Morgan, Squire, Amaral, Suzuki, 1989#. The parahippocampus has been implicated in the encoding of novel material #Gabrieli, Brewer, Desmond, Glover, 1997; Stern et al. 1996#, but our Semantic task involved no novelty manipulation. However, the subordinate level words clearly had lower ....

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. #1972#. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

....Bulgaria. The League of Nations refused to sell food to Greece. Also, when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, the United States refused to sell grain to the Soviet Union. Research on human memory retrieval has shown that retrieval is influenced by the processing task at storage time [3] 4] [5]. Prior experiences are more difficult to retrieve if the goals at storage and retrieval time are different [6] For computer models of memory, this implies that to retrieve a case as a precedent for more than one purpose, it is necessary to index the case in more than one manner and to include a ....

Craik, F. & Lockhart, R. (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior 11:671-684.

....highlighting would improve memory of where pages were stored spatially on the data mountain, due to subjects having spent more time attending to related pages and considering the suggestions proffered by the system. This hypothesis was based on the theoretical notion of levels of processing [2]. According to this theory, information can be processed more or less deeply, ranging from a shallow analysis (attention to surface features) to a deeper, semantic analysis. Information that is processed more deeply has been shown to be more likely to be remembered over time. In these studies, we ....

....phase of this study were mixed, and suggest that good Implicit Queries in the user interface in the storage of information during web interaction might lead to slightly more detailed categorization at the cost of significantly longer storage times. According to Levels of Processing Theory [2], the increased time spent in information management could result in a deeper encoding of subjects web page organizations on the Data Mountain and might therefore facilitate subsequent web page retrieval in both speed and accuracy. Questionnaire data suggested that subjects were equally ....

Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671-684.

....that can help us memorise facts. Since baselevel activation is calculated from the number of times a certain fact is retrieved, rehearsal can emulate extra uses of a certain fact. In other words, rehearsal tricks the base level learning mechanism into increasing the activation of a certain chunk. Craik and Lockhart (1972) have observed that the effectiveness of rehearsal depends on dependency2 3 isa dependency goal example goal1 modified example solution1 constraints fact2 3 example goal1 isa addition problem arg1 two arg2 three answer nil example solution1 isa addition problem arg1 two arg2 three answer five ....

Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research.

....subjects did not know in advance how the past tense would be formed; producing correct responses required identifying each present tense verb as a particular lexical item. The Regular and Nonce Past conditions therefore differed from the Irregular Past condition in terms of the depth of processing (Craik Lockhart 1972) that was required: the Irregular condition required a deeper analysis of each item than the other conditions. This confound is important because other neuroimaging studies indicate that stimuli that are processed more deeply produce different brain activity than stimuli that are processed more ....

Craik, Fergus I.M., & Robert S. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11.671-684.

.... the design and application of EAs has been receiving growing attention during the last few years; 2] 12] 20] 16] 7] 9] 21] and [5] A widely recognized framework for understanding human memory, known as the Levels of processing framework, was proposed by Craik and Lockhart in 1972 [6]. They suggested that the level or depth of processing of a stimulus has a substantial effect on its memorability, and that deeper levels of analysis produce more elaborate, longer lasting, and stronger memory traces than do shallow levels of analysis. Recent empirical evaluations of SV seem to ....

F.I.M. Craik and R.S. Lockhart. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. , 11:671--684, 1972.

....( Does the word denote a living thing ) No explicit instructions to learn the words were given nor were the participants advised of a subsequent memory test. It is well known that meaning based encoding of verbal items is more effective than perceptual encoding the Levels of Processing EffEct [4,5,17]. The results showed that meaning based processing, in comparison with perceptual processing, led to: i) a significantly higher performance on a subsequent recognition test; and (ii) an enhanced rCBF, reflecting increased neuronal in volvement, of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We ....

.... [16] Since all these studies include accessing and manipulating semantic representations, we have suggested this region is involved in working with meaning [16] There is a rich literature in cognitive psychology linking working with meaning to encoding the Levels of Processing effect [4,17]. It has been known for over two decades that stimuli processed with reference to their semantic at tributes are remembered much better than those learned with reference to perceptual attributes. In fact, it has been shown that as long as the stimuli are processed semantically, explicit ....

Craik, F.I.M. and Lockhart, R.S., Levels of processing: a framework for memory research, J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behar;., 11 (1972) 671-684.

No context found.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

No context found.

Craik, F.I.M., & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671-684.

No context found.

Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.

No context found.

Craik, F. I. M. and Lockhart, R. S. , Levels of Processing: A framework for memory research ,in Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour,1972, Vol.11, pp.671-684.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC