| E. Gullichsen. BiggerTalk: Object-oriented Prolog. Technical Report STP-125-85, MCCSTP, Austin, TX, 1985. |
....review is not intended to be exhaustive; it is limited to what is considered representative. A more detailed treatment of this topic is reported in other literature [6, 4] In the first camp, objects are either emulated as unconditional clauses or perpetual processes. Languages and systems [19, 11, 22, 8] of this camp force a programmer to subscribe to the clausal view or the process view which do not necessarily agree with the object model [5] as subscribed by the object oriented programming paradigm in programming design. In addition, extra logical constructs are employed to model state changes. ....
E. Gullichsen. BiggerTalk: Object-oriented Prolog. Technical Report STP-125-85, MCCSTP, Austin, TX, 1985.
....detailed treatment of this topic is reported in other literature [10, 11] Logical Emulation of Objects There are two different approaches to emulating objects in logic programming languages and systems: objects as unconditional clauses and objects as perpetual processes. In the first approach [12, 13], objects are represented as a set of unconditional clauses. For each of these unconditional clauses, the predicate symbol denotes a property of an object instance. The arguments of this unconditional clause state the values of this property and the reference of this object instance. All ....
E. Gullichsen. BiggerTalk: Object-oriented Prolog. Technical Report STP-125-85, MCC-STP, Austin, TX, 1985.
Online articles have much greater impact More about CiteSeer.IST Add search form to your site Submit documents Feedback
CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC