Norman C. Hutchinson. Protocols versus parallelism. In Proceedings from the x-Kernel Workshop, Tucson, AZ, November 1992. University of Arizona.  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....Effects in TCP does not. In this example, the application is our test code, which simply counts packets that arrive. The application s critical section itself is small, a lock increment unlock sequence; the performance is lost preserving the order. We are not the first to observe this problem [11, 13], but to our knowledge, previous work has not provided adequate solutions. For example, in [11] Goldberg et al. use a ticketing scheme similar to ours, but assign tickets to packets at the driver for use in re ordering at the application. However, this assumes a one to one correspondence between ....

Norman C. Hutchinson. Protocols versus parallelism. In Proceedings from the x-Kernel Workshop, Tucson, AZ, November 1992. University of Arizona.

....Checksum Off, With Ticketing Checksum On, No Ticketing Checksum Off, No Ticketing Figure 2.15 Ticketing Effects in TCP The application s critical section itself is small, a lock increment unlock sequence; the performance is lost preserving the order. We are not the first to observe this problem [48, 57], but to our knowledge, previous work has not provided adequate solutions. For example, in [48] Goldberg et al. use a ticketing scheme similar to ours, but assign tickets to packets at the driver for use in re ordering at the application. However, this assumes a one to one correspondence between ....

Hutchinson, N. C. Protocols versus parallelism. In Proceedings from the xKernel Workshop, Tucson, AZ, Nov. 1992. University of Arizona.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST - Copyright Penn State and NEC